Net Zero Devon, Plymouth and Torbay Reports

The Centre for Energy and the Environment at the University of Exeter was commissioned to provide quantified projections of carbon emissions for Plymouth, Torbay and the area administered by Devon County Council following a “business as usual” path, and a separate path following the national policies as suggested by the Committee on Climate Change to achieve netzero by 2050. To assess the impact of targeting an earlier date for net-zero, further work was undertaken to assess how Devon may be able to meet the target by 2030.

Download the combined report

The combined Net Zero Devon, Plymouth and Torbay Report can be downloaded here and viewed in an accessible format below.

You can view the individual reports for each area here:

Devon

Plymouth

Torbay

Net Zero Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

CENTRE FOR ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT

D. Lash, A. Norton & T. A. Mitchell, published August 2020.

Devon County Council (DCC) declared a climate emergency in February 2019, pledging to facilitate the reduction of Devon’s carbon emissions to net-zero by 2050 at the latest. Districts within Devon have also declared climate emergencies and aim to become carbon neutral at earlier dates (2025, 2030 and 2040). Plymouth City Council (PCC) declared a climate emergency in March 2019, pledging the city to become carbon neutral by 2030. Torbay Council declared a climate emergency in June 2019, pledging to identify ways of making Torbay carbon neutral by 2030.

The Centre for Energy and the Environment (CEE) at the University of Exeter was commissioned by DCC to combine previous studies to provide consolidated quantified projections of carbon emissions for Devon, Plymouth and Torbay (DPT) following a “business as usual” path, and with the national policies (either in place, or required) to achieve Net Zero. These projections were based on meeting Net Zero by 2050 (the currently proposed national timeline). To assess the impact of targeting an earlier date for Net Zero further work was undertaken to assess how DPT may be able to meet the target by 2030.

DPT’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2016 were 8,294 ktCO2e. Between 2008 and 2016 emission fell 19%. However, much of the reduction was in the power sector which benefits from national renewable electricity production. If the power sector is excluded, GHG emissions fell 6% between 2008 and 2016 but emissions and rose 5% between 2011 and 2016. The dominant sectors in 2016 (86% of emissions) were, transport (28%), buildings (23%), agriculture and land use change (19%), and power (16%). Projections from the 2016 baseline utilised two reports produced by the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) in 2018: Progress Report to Parliament and Net Zero: The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming. These documents assess and project GHG emissions by sector in the UK to 2032 and 2050 respectively and these emission reduction projections were apportioned to the equivalent sectors in DPT.

The projections show that in the absence of any carbon reduction policy GHG emissions in DPT would rise 16% (to 9,657 ktCO2e) in 2050.

Low, medium and high risk policies to the end of the 5th Carbon Budget in 2032 would see emissions fall 34% (to 5,475 ktCO2e or 4,594 ktCO2e if policy to meet the “policy gap” was to be identified) compared to the 8,535 ktCO2e under business as usual. Of this carbon reduction, 13% is from “low risk” policy, 38% from “medium risk” policy and 27% from “high risk” policy. The final 22% is the current policy gap.

Projecting to 2050, the CCC’s Core scenario would see emissions drop 61% (to 3,226 ktCO2e), and delivering the measures in the Further Ambition scenario would see a 77% fall (to 1,910 ktCO2e). The inclusion of GHG removal technologies or off-setting would be required to achieve carbon neutrality (see graph below). The persistence of agricultural and land use emissions is perhaps the most noteworthy feature in the projections. The sector represents nearly 57% of projected emissions in 2050 and reflects DPT’s geographically rural character. However, within DPT places like Plymouth, Torbay and Exeter will have a very different make up of emissions and such urban areas will therefore have different sectorial weightings in their local priorities for GHG reduction.

Emissions reductions by sector are summarised as follows:

  • Power – Emissions from the power sector in DPT (1,366 ktCO2e in 2016) are projected to fall to 32 ktCO2e in 2050 (98%) despite the anticipated doubling electricity demand mainly due to use in heat pumps in buildings and eclectic vehicles. Nationally future generation will be from variable renewables (57%, mostly offshore wind), with nuclear and existing hydro and biomass with carbon capture and storage (CCS) making up 20%. The residual 23% will use fossil gas with all the CO2 emissions captured and stored. CCS will also play a major role in the production of hydrogen for use in industry and transport as 84% of hydrogen production will come from reforming gas into hydrogen and CO2. Devon currently produces 32% of the electricity it uses from renewable and waste sources. Estimates of renewable energy generation potential in Devon suggest that the county has the resources to become a net electricity exporter despite the potential doubling of electricity demand foreseen by the CCC by 2050. Plymouth currently produces 16% of the electricity it uses from renewable and waste sources. Assuming electricity demand in Plymouth doubles by 2050 similar levels may be maintained if the potential additional solar PV deployment is delivered comprising 34,000 installations, over 90% of which (31,000) are on homes (26% of the projected 2050 Plymouth housing stock). Torbay has few energy assets either on the demand or supply side that would allow renewable energy projects to be developed. Current renewable energy production is largely from roof mounted solar photovoltaic panels and provides 1.6% of Torbay’s current electricity consumption.  There is some potential for larger scale renewable energy to be developed in Torbay and, if all the sites identified were to be exploited, up to 10% of Torbay’s current electricity consumption could be produced locally.
  • Buildings – Non-electricity (direct) emissions from buildings are responsible for 23% of DPT’s emissions (1935 ktCO2e in 2016) and are projected to fall 95% to 92 ktCO2e by 2050. This would require progressive planning policy to bring forward zero carbon standards for new development, and numerous measures to address emissions from existing buildings. For dwellings, this means providing an appropriate insulation measure for every available loft and cavity walled building (109,000 new installations), as well as the majority of solid walled buildings (109,000 new installations). For non-domestic buildings, including many used for industrial purposes, this means identifying significant energy reduction opportunities, though this sector is more varied than the domestic sector and it is harder to identify specific high level opportunities. In addition to this, the heat supply to buildings will need to be decarbonised. For off-gas buildings this is likely to mean heat pumps, whilst for on-gas buildings this may include low carbon heat networks (91,000 in DPT) as well as heat pumps (potentially up to 344,000 installations in total).
  • Industry – Direct large industrial emissions (43 ktCO2e in 2016 or 0.5% of DPT’s emissions) are projected to reduce by 88% to 5 ktCO2e in 2050. DPT has little energy intensive industry and much of its business energy use is indirect (electricity) or from industrial buildings and associated transport with emissions falling under the respective sectors. Nine industrial emitters have been identified dispersed across DPT the largest of which, BCT in Heathfield, went into administration in 2018. Measures to reduce industrial emissions include energy efficiency and the provision of zero carbon heat initially from bio-energy and electricity then from hydrogen and ammonia. Uptake by business will need to be driven by a national programme and accelerating this will require additional funding. It will also be necessary to deepen the understanding of industry across the county perhaps through a specialist unit working with larger emitters which would also develop a programme to reach smaller industrial emitters. In parallel with developing this industrial insight the unit could work with planners to develop appropriate low carbon industrial zones in DPT.
  • Transport – Low carbon transport is essential for Net Zero. The sector, excluding aviation and shipping,  accounts for 28% of DPT’s 2016 emissions (2,322 ktCO2e) and these are projected to fall by 80% to 436 ktCO2e in 2050 (24% of emissions). A combination of technological and behavioural changes will be required to transition to electric cars and vans. Both the evolution of vehicle technology (to bring down costs and improve range) and the development of charging infrastructure will be needed. Larger vehicles such as HGVs will be harder to tackle and possible technological solutions may include bio-methane, hydrogen or electrification. In addition to these technological changes, it is assumed that 10% of car journeys (measured by distance rather than by trip) can be shifted to walking and cycling, and that distance travelled by freight can be reduced by 10% through improvements to logistics (e.g. using urban consolidation centres). GHG emissions will be reduced from railways via fuel switching (electrification of main lines and potentially hydrogen for branch lines). Although shipping is not include in DPT’s emissions it is worth noting changes in fuels for shipping (to hydrogen and ammonia) may suggest significant changes in DPT’s dockyards.
  • Agriculture and land use change – Direct emissions from the Agriculture and Land Use Change sector are responsible for 19% of emissions (1,587 ktCO­2e) and are projected to fall by 32% to 1,086 ktCO2e by 2050. This leaves the sector responsible for 57% of the footprint in 2050 and means that identifying new measures for agricultural carbon reduction is important to achieve net zero emissions. The CCC assumes a variety of on-farm practices to reduce non‑CO­2 emissions from soils, livestock, waste and manure management and from reduced energy consumption in stationary and other farm machinery as well as extensive afforestation (up to 3,600 Ha/annum if 2030 is the target date for Zero Carbon). Mitigating methane emissions from sheep and cattle is addressed through livestock breeding programmes as well as reductions in both meat and dairy consumption and wastage.
  • Waste – Waste emissions, mostly methane from landfill, were 7% of DPT’s emissions in 2016 (590 ktCO2e) and are projected to decline 71% by 2050 to168 ktCO2e when they will represent 9% of DPT’s emissions. The local authorities have stopped landfilling the domestic waste and municipal waste is now either recycled or used for energy recovery. The position in the non-domestic waste is very different. Here, even obtaining reliable up to date information on the volume and composition of non-domestic waste streams to enable emissions assessment is a challenge. This needs to be rectified. Measures to reduce emissions from waste include additional methane capture from old landfill sites, segregated food waste collection (fed to new AD capacity) and reduced waste generation.
  • F Gases – Fluorinated gasses (F-gases) represent 5% of DPT’s emissions (452 ktCO2e in 2016). Most emissions (94% in the UK) are from hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and the largest source is the refrigeration, air conditioning and heat pump (RACHP) sector. Emissions in 2050 are projected to be 62 ktCO2e, an 86% reduction which is likely to be achieved through regulation at national level. Acceleration to 2030 would require local measures to stop the use of RACHP and other equipment containing F-gases and local enforcement of ‘management measures’ including regular leak checks and repair, gas recovery at end-of-life, record keeping, training and certification of technicians and product labelling.
  • GHG removal – Achieving net zero emission in the UK will require some level of GHG removal to mitigate residual emissions in difficult sectors such as air transport. Without GHG removal DPT’s residual emissions in 2050 are projected to be 1,910 ktCO2e, 23% of 2016 emissions.  A national programme of GHG removals is likely to be needed to tackle this level of residual emissions. Localised CCS technologies which could for example be applied to the flue of the Devonport and Marsh Barton EfW plant may evolve and various technologies are currently being developed and trialled.

Using the CCC’s net cost methodology, the net cost for DPT to achieve net zero emissions in 2050 is estimated at £895 million per year. This equates to 1.5% of DPT’s GDP in 2050, or approximately £661 per head of population in that year. The proportion of GDP calculated for DPT is higher than the 1% national average which partly reflects the different composition of the carbon footprint, and the lower GDP of DPT compared to the UK average. Buildings and agriculture are the sectors with the highest abatement costs. GHG removal also has high costs. The CCC scenarios assume that the country as a whole moves towards Net Zero in a coordinated way and that due to the wide take-up of measures across sectors they become cheaper over time.

Achieving the same amount of carbon reduction by 2030 would in effect require compressing the same measures into a timeframe that is only about a third as long. For some of the proposed measures where the technology is sufficiently mature (e.g. insulating all lofts and cavity walls) this might be possible, though it would require the funding mechanisms to do so, and there would also need to be local capacity for delivery. In addition, existing barriers that have already prevented such action from occurring would need to be overcome (e.g. in the case of these insulation measures, the lack of engagement from some property owners, issues associated with the high exposure of DPT properties to wind driven rain and the potential negative impact of this on some types of cavity fill solutions). In other cases, faster deployment may be possible but would face increased cost and other barriers. For example, electric vehicles are currently available but they are significantly more expensive than their conventional counterparts, and suffer from reduced ranges and lack of widespread charging infrastructure. In other cases, the technology may not yet be sufficiently developed to implement now e.g. some of the proposed GHG removal technologies.

These issues are significant when considered at a national level, but would be exacerbated if DPT were to pursue this timeline independently of the planned rate of change nationally. This would mean that many of these measures would need to be deployed without the support of national policy (e.g. regulation or financial rewards) and in many cases would rely on utilising technology that may not be sufficiently developed (or that is very expensive) to achieve the requisite amount of GHG emission reduction. These issues in general relate to the deployment of technological solutions (e.g. electricity generation, insulation, electric vehicles, GHG removal etc.), and so if any of these identified solutions do not prove to be possible at the scale required, then additional measures would be required. These may be from other sectors (i.e. “over delivery” in one sector to offset shortfalls in another), or could require voluntary actions by citizens and businesses in DPT to reduce demand. Examples of this could include reducing travel, accepting lower temperatures in buildings, decarbonising agriculture and industry etc. Clearly, these have a significant political dimension, would not be possible in many areas and would be opposed by many due to loss of GVA, jobs, comfort, amenity etc. In some cases (e.g. deindustrialisation), there is also the risk of “carbon leakage” i.e. those processes simply moving to another place and creating emissions there.

An indicative analysis of the costs to meet the target by 2030 increases the estimated annual net cost from £895 million to about £2,522 million (1.5% GDP in the target year to 6.7% GDP) equivalent to £1,992 per person. These costs are likely to be significantly understated, and in addition, the up-front capital costs involved would be significantly higher as the net costs are inclusive of benefits. As these benefits do not necessarily align with the parties responsible for bearing the cost, the actual cost excluding any benefits is arguably more representative of the scale of the financing challenge that DPT could face accelerating beyond the national trajectory.

The analysis has clearly shown that significant action is needed across every sector to achieve the deep emission reduction that would be required by 2030. Should it not be possible to achieve carbon reduction in any particular sector then this would require additional reduction to be achieved in other sectors. Whilst there are significant challenges in meeting this level of reduction, particularly within an accelerated timescale, there may also be some opportunities specific to DPT.

The next step should be to undertake further “bottom up” work to establish more specifically the amount of GHG emissions reduction that could be achieved. This analysis should include envisaged costs and savings and should be based on locally available resource assessments across each sector. It may be worthwhile separating this piece of work into an analysis of each sector.

These analyses should look to engage more widely with stakeholders in DPT to utilise the locally available expertise. DPT has made great progress in this area having already established the Devon Climate Emergency Response Group and appointing a Net-Zero Task Force to develop a Devon Carbon Plan. The process will also involve a citizen’s assembly which will deliberate on the plan. Budgets have been made available to support further evidence base analysis and wider public engagement processes.

The Carbon Plan will need to contain sector specific action and delivery plans, which would identify a programme of measures, the stakeholders required to deliver those measures, and identification of budgets or alternative routes to finance the measures.

The table below provides a summary of initial priority actions identified from this work as a starting point.

SectorImmediate Priority
GeneralUndertake a policy mapping exercise of current and proposed policy to establish where it supports or hinders carbon reduction and identify key gaps.
GeneralProduce sector-by-sector “bottom up” projections of GHG emissions using detailed local data.
PowerUndertake an up-to-date review of potential for renewable energy development and include RE development sites in the local plan.
PowerWork with WPD and others to ensure electricity infrastructure is capable of meeting increased local energy generation and demand for electricity from the heating, industry and transport sectors.
PowerPlanning policy should ensure all new buildings are connected to the electricity network via three-phase supplies.
PowerLook to trial and support smart electricity projects, including those with battery storage aspects.
BuildingsInvestigate opportunities to require zero carbon from all new planned development.
BuildingsUndertake a bottom-up assessment of opportunities for insulation in existing dwellings by tenure, and seek to make use of existing ECO funding whilst lobbying for more ambitious national insulation programmes.
BuildingsPro-actively enforce the MEES (Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards) which apply to all privately rented dwellings and non-domestic buildings.
BuildingsSeek to engage the non-domestic sector by working with landlords and institutions like the Chamber of Commerce to identify the potential for retrofitting existing non-domestic buildings.
BuildingsCreate a renewable heat strategy by appraising the potential for low carbon heat networks, heat pumps, and hybrid boilers, including identifying current potential funding models and barriers to uptake.
BuildingsWork in partnership with large energy users in the non-domestic sectors including health and education sectors to share best practice in energy reduction
IndustrySupport identified large emitters with carbon reduction activities.
IndustryUndertake a detailed review or business activity in DPT to identify energy-intensive industrial users.
IndustryAppraise the potential for low carbon industrial zones (LCIZ)
TransportExplore ways to promote the uptake of EVs e.g. via reduced or free parking, permissive use of bus lanes etc.
TransportWork with partners to plan and develop charging infrastructure across the DPT in key public and work places and include plans to address the tourism sector
TransportSeek to shift trips from private car to lower carbon alternatives such as walking, cycling, car clubs and public transport.
TransportWork with bodies such as the Freight Transport Association and the Road Haulage Association as well as with major hauliers and haulage clients directly to reduce emissions from freight movement, for example by planning consolidation centres.
TransportWork with bus providers to consider the business case for replacing the existing bus fleet with zero carbon variants e.g. by following London’s example.
Agriculture land use & forestryUse County farms to pioneer changes in on farm practises to reduce methane and nitrous oxide intensity of crops and livestock farming and work with landowners and NFU to roll out countywide. Promote the adoption of low-impact diets.
Agriculture land use & forestrySupport the development of on-farm bio-methane collection and use with a focus on supplying bio-methane for farm machinery. Deliver on County farms together with electrification and building energy efficiency measures.
Agriculture land use & forestryUse the planning system to identify preferred areas for tree planting and peatland restoration which match the required scale, adopt planning policies which prioritise afforestation and peatland restoration and apply on county owned land.
WasteCheck status of all legacy and recent landfill sites and assess opportunities for additional methane capture and energy production.
WasteDrive forward increased separation of food/biodegradable waste collection with waste directed to local Anaerobic Digestion facilities.
WasteDevelop local promotion campaigns with the aim of reducing waste generation (especially food waste) with a 25% reduction by 2025 and to increase household/municipal recycling rates (especially plastics) from the current 56% to 65%  to reduce disposal emissions from EfW.
WasteIncrease heat offtake from EfW plants to improve efficiency and reducing net emissions.
WasteIdentify processing gaps in wider South West region waste recycling and treatment facilities and make appropriate provision for particular materials where gaps are identified.
WasteDevelop a much better understanding of commercial waste generation and treatment in DPT to enable monitoring and regulation with the aim of reducing waste volumes and increasing recycling.
WasteLiaise with South West Water to achieve a reduction in methane and N2O emissions of least 20% by 2030.
F-gasesPro-actively enforce Air Conditioning inspections for all systems with an effective rated output in excess of 12 kW.
GHG RemovalIdentify potential sites where trial of GHG removal technologies may be viable and seek to capture central government funds in partnership with technology providers to host prototypes.

Devon County Council (DCC) declared a climate emergency in February 2019, pledging to facilitate the reduction of Devon’s carbon emissions to net-zero by 2050 at the latest. Districts within Devon have also declared climate emergencies and aim to become carbon neutral at earlier dates (2025, 2030 and 2040). Plymouth City Council (PCC) declared a climate emergency in March 2019, pledging the city to become carbon neutral by 2030. Torbay Council declared a climate emergency in June 2019, pledging to identify ways of making Torbay carbon neutral by 2030.

For the purpose of this study carbon neutral is interpreted as achieving net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in line with the Committee on Climate Change’s Net Zero report (see below). The Centre for Energy and the Environment (CEE) at the University of Exeter was commissioned by DCC to combine previous studies1 to provide consolidated quantified projections of carbon emissions for Devon, Plymouth and Torbay (DPT) following a “business as usual” path, and with the national policies (either in place, or required) to achieve Net Zero. These projections were based on meeting Net Zero by 2050 (the currently proposed national timeline), but given the aims to accelerate this timetable further work was undertaken to assess how DPT may be able to meet the target by 2030 and identify some of the challenges this will involve.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission projections start from a baseline GHG inventory for DPT. This is an inventory of emissions that arise within its geographic boundary i.e. they are accounted for on a production basis. For example, whilst emissions arise from the Industrial sector in producing goods that are traded beyond DPT’s borders, the emissions from all of the production are allocated to DPT. Similarly, any goods that are imported into DPT will result in emissions in manufacture that occur elsewhere and that are not counted in DPT’s footprint. It is estimated by the Committee on Climate Change3 in its 2018 Progress Report to Parliament that in the UK average GHG emissions are 8 tCO2e/person if measured on a production basis or 13 tCO2e/person if measured on a consumption basis.

Initial analysis (see Appendix A) provides historic GHG emissions from 2008 to the most recently published data (2016) broken down by sector and greenhouse gas, together with total emissions expressed in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e)2.

In order to project emissions from 2016 forward to 2050, two key documents from the Committee on Climate Change3 (CCC) were utilised:

  • 2018 Progress Report to Parliament (referred to as the Progress Report)4
  • Net Zero: The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming (referred to as the Net Zero report)5

Both of these documents assess and project GHG emissions by sector in the UK. The Progress Report is the latest in an annual series of reports that charts progress in each sector over recent years, and analyses the potential of existing and required policy to meet the requirements of future carbon budget periods6. The 2018 Progress Report runs to 2032, the end of the fifth carbon budget. The Net Zero report considers what policies and action is necessary by 2050 in order to achieve Net Zero GHG emissions.

In this work national emissions reduction projections from the two documents have been apportioned to the equivalent sectors in DPT. For example, if it were assumed nationally that by a certain year transport emissions would halve due to a series of government policies, then it was assumed transport emissions in DPT would also halve. Exceptions to this approach occurred in some areas, for example in the Industry sector much of the decarbonisation is associated with certain types of heavy industry that are not found in DPT, so the trajectory for the Industry sector in DPT discounted savings from those sectors. In other areas however, no specific considerations for DPT were made.

This is therefore a simplified approach, and differs from one where a series of known policies are individually modelled for DPT. Whilst this might be possible on a policy-by-policy basis, the approach taken has the advantage of being based on the latest assessment of government policies and calculated costs and savings. Many of the required decarbonisation measures are only really feasible when tackled at a national scale. A full “bottom-up” calculation of the impact of individual policies would require in depth detail on the uptake, impact and costs of each policy, which were not available. However, while much of the policy in the CCC reports is national, in many cases there will be a strong requirement for local actors to effectively engage at the delivery stage e.g. home insulation programmes, electric vehicle infrastructure, diet change etc.

In general, the sectors in DPT’s GHG inventory, the Progress Report and the Net Zero report align well. The exceptions are the transport sector and the agriculture and land use sectors.

In the case of transport the Progress Report combines all transport modes (including aviation and shipping) into one sector, whereas for the other two, aviation and shipping are segregated. As the savings associated with each policy in the Progress Report could not be isolated it was necessary to consider transport as a single sector, inclusive of aviation and shipping. An analysis of DPT’s historic aviation and shipping emissions7 concluded that, due to the incomplete nature of the emissions data and high levels of uncertainty, aviation and shipping should not be included. The Transport sector therefore includes only inland surface transport.

The agriculture and land use change sectors are often combined, so for the calculations undertaken here they were also combined.

The Progress Report projects GHG emissions across the UK economy based on existing policies that are in place to deliver GHG reduction to 2032. For each of these policies, the CCC used three criteria to assess those policies:

  • Design and implementation: Whether the policy tackles the right barriers, has the right track record of delivery, and avoids risks associated with a lack of coherence or political support.
  • Incentives: Whether there are the right monetary or regulatory incentives in place to deliver the policy.
  • Funding: Whether there is sufficient funding now and in the future to deliver the policy.

If all three criteria are met, then the policy is deemed to be low risk. Where any one of the criteria is failed then the policy is deemed to be medium risk. At a national level, two-thirds of potential emission reduction in 2032 is at this risk of under-delivery. Proposals which are not specified in sufficient detail to be classified as policies are labelled as high risk intentions. At a national level, a quarter of potential emission reduction in 2032 is at this high level of risk. In addition, in order to meet the CCC’s least-cost path for decarbonisation, additional potential policies have been identified to bridge any gap between policies in place or intended and the CCC’s least cost pathway. Delivering this “policy gap” will be required both to provide contingency for meeting carbon budgets, and to decarbonise further than the Climate Change Act’s 80% reduction requirement (i.e. to Net Zero). These policies from both CCC reports were assigned to each sector within DPT to enable GHG trajectories within each of these sectors to be developed to 2032 (with policy risks) and then 2050.

The Net Zero report is used for projections from 2032 to 2050. The Net Zero Core Scenario addresses the 80% GHG reduction required by 2050 under the Climate Change Act. The Further Ambition Scenario considers more challenging more expensive options which nationally archive 96% emission reduction by 2050. Achieving the remaining 4% to deliver Net Zero requires further Speculative Options which have high costs, technology challenges or low levels of public acceptability.

Projections from the two CCC reports are combined and apportioned to DPT.  An example of the output that was produced for each sector is shown in Figure 1, together with an explanation of how the graph is intended to be interpreted.

Figure 1: GHG Emission trajectory for a sector (buildings) as used within this report. Each part of the graph means the following: 1 = historic emissions; 2 = savings to 2032 from low risk policies; 3 = savings to 2032 from medium risk policies; 4 = savings to 2032 from high risk intentions; 5 = savings to 2032 that would need to be delivered to meet the CCC’s least-cost decarbonisation path but where there is currently no policy; 6 = savings from 2032 to 2050 from the Net Zero report Core Scenario; 7 = savings from 2032 to 2050 from the Net Zero report Further Ambition Scenario; 8 = emissions in 2050 in the absence of any policy (business as usual); 9 = emissions in 2050 with all identified policy delivered.

DPT’s 2016 GHG emissions (excluding aviation and shipping8) were 8,294 ktCO2e. The split of emissions is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: The make-up of DPT’s 2016 GHG emissions

Current and projected GHG emissions in DPT are shown in Figure 3 (values for 2016, 2032 and 2050 are provided in Appendix B). 2016 emissions (8,294 ktCO2e), in the absence of any carbon reduction policy, would rise to 9,656 ktCO2e in 2050 (including an allowance for population growth9). Low, medium and high risk policies to the end of the 5th Carbon Budget in 2032 would see emissions fall to 5,475 ktCO2e (or 4,594 ktCO2e if policy to meet the “policy gap” to and achieve the CCC’s least-cost decarbonisation path was to be identified) compared to the 8,535 ktCO2e under business as usual. Of this carbon reduction, 13% is from “low risk” policy, 38% from “medium risk” policy and 27% from “high risk” policy. The final 22% is the current policy gap. Projecting to 2050, the CCC’s Core scenario would see emissions drop to 3,226 ktCO2e, and delivering the measures in the Further Ambition scenario would see a further fall to 1,910 ktCO2e. The inclusion of GHG removal technologies and offsetting would be required to achieve net zero emissions.

Figure 3: Projected GHG emissions in DPT including policies and their risk levels to 2032, and the CCC Net Zero scenarios to 2050, including GHG removal (purple shades)

Projected emissions broken down by sector are shown in Figure 4. This shows the scale and proportions of carbon reduction from business as usual that are associated with measures in each sector from Core scenario policies (dark shades) and the additional savings associated with the Further Ambition scenario (light shades). At a national level, the Core scenario results in 77% emission reduction, and the Further Ambition scenario a 96% reduction. The largest reductions in emissions are planned to come from the Power, Buildings and Transport sectors, with a significant amount of further abatement required from GHG removal technologies.

The underlying policies and assumptions driving these trajectories are discussed in the next sections.

Figure 4: GHG trajectories in DPT to 2050 arranged by sector with each sector split into the Core (dark shades) and Further Ambition (light shades) scenarios.

Projected GHG emissions for the Power sector (i.e. electricity consumed by all sectors in Devon) are shown in Figure 5 (values for 2016, 2032 and 2050 are provided in Appendix A).

Figure 5: Projected GHG emissions in DPT’s Power sector to 2050 as a result of national policy (interpretation of graph is described in caption to Figure 1)

Power, distributed through the national and regional electricity networks is the sector of the UK economy which has decarbonised most rapidly with emissions in 2017 (72 MtCO2e) falling 64% from 1990 levels (203MtCO2e) and 54% from 2010 levels (157MtCO2e).

The resulting national grid emission factor has fallen by 47% from 499 gCO2/kWh in 2010 to 263 gCO2/kWh in 2017. The use of a national emissions factor for local Scope 2 CO2 emissions calculations precludes considering carbon emissions from power at a local level by, for example, considering renewable electricity generation in DPT as DPT’s CO2 reduction. All renewable energy generation in the UK contributes to national emissions reduction, so while DPT should do everything possible to deliver renewable electricity generation, the emission reduction benefits will be shared across the country.  The national strategy for decarbonising the power sector is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: CCC indicators for monitoring progress in the UK power sector to 203010

The CCC highlights the potential growth in national demand for electricity to 2050 (Figure 7).

New uses for electricity in vehicles and buildings (See Sections 7 and 5 respectively) and for hydrogen production double the demand for power from 300TWh in 2017 to 600TWh in 2050. Other potential for further electrification could conceivably more than quadruple current demand to over 1,300TWh.

Figure 7: Potential new UK electricity demands from 2017 to 205011 (source CCC Net Zero technical report)

4.1 Low risk policy to 2032

Low risk policies are responsible for 26% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC identifies policy on renewables incentives, in particular contracted contracts for difference (CfD) auctions (which should provide around 130 TWh of generation from renewables  nationally by 2020/21), and the switching away from coal fired generation, which is to be banned by 2025, as current low risk policies.

4.2 Medium risk policy to 2032

Medium risk policies are responsible for 34% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • The Hinckley C nuclear power station due the scale and complexity of the project
  • Further CfD auctions
  • Power system flexibility

4.3 High risk policy to 2032

High risk policies are responsible for 24% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these risks as the potential impact of:

  • Delay or cancellation of other planned nuclear plants after Hinckley C (which would reduce low carbon electricity generation)
  • Reduction of low carbon electricity imports from the continent |(e.g. less nuclear electricity from France)

4.4 Policy gap risk policy to 2032

Policy gaps are responsible for 16% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Policy on carbon capture and storage (CCS), which is essential for the full decarbonisation of the power sector, is the largest gap.
  • A pathway for a subsidy free route to market for renewable energy
  • Contingency plans for alternative technologies to replace new nuclear or power import risk.

4.5 Core scenario to 2050

The CCC has identified the following core options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally:

  • Expansion of renewables, nuclear power and CCS to produce 95% of the UKs electricity requiring significant new renewable generation and a fleet of gas fired power stations to provide stability to the power generation system of which half will need to be decarbonised through CCS.
  • Hydrogen in the Core scenario is restricted to niche, localised applications, requiring limited additional hydrogen transportation or storage infrastructure.

4.6 Further ambition to 2050

Emissions from the power sector are reduced to close to zero in the Further Ambition scenario while meeting increased electricity demand. The CCC has identified the following further ambition options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally:

  • Hydrogen use in the Further Ambition scenario is more widespread.
  • Gas distribution networks are used to transport hydrogen to buildings, power generation and industrial facilities and refuelling stations and some new hydrogen transmission infrastructure is also built.
  • Decarbonising power plant through hydrogen fuel may be more effective than building dedicated gas CCS power plants.
  • New nuclear
  • Biomass energy with  carbon capture and storage (BECCS)In this scenario all gas generation has CCS (Figure 8)12
Figure 8: Illustrative generation mix for a UK low carbon power system in 205013

Figure 9 shows the potential national uses and sources of hydrogen in 2050.

Figure 9: Use and production of hydrogen in the UK Further Ambition scenario14 (Source Net Zero Technical report)

4.7 Opportunities for accelerated delivery in DPT

4.7.1 Devon

The 905 MW Langage gas fired power station is the only large fossil fuel power generator in Devon. It is a new highly efficient combined cycle gas turbine plant and is therefore likely to operate until the end of its design life. However, capture and storage of CO2 emissions in the vicinity the site is likely to

be more expensive than elsewhere in the UK and Langage is therefore likely to be displaced by other gas CCS plant which has easier aces to long term CO2 storage.

Exeter has two peaking power plants the aging 50MW OCGT in Marsh Barton and some smaller diesel generation facilities15 which provide support to the electricity grid at peak times. These facilities are likely to be displaced as demand side response and battery technologies emerge.

Renewable and waste generated energy generated in Devon is summarised in Table 1. Whilst renewable electricity is only of interest in this section, heat technologies are included for interest/completeness.

TechnologyInstallationsElectricity capacity MWeHeat capacity MWthTotal capacity MWElectricity generation GWhHeat generation GWhTotal generation GWh
Anaerobic digestion3512719761591
Biomass1,397611211830352382
Energy from waste113 1336 36
Heat pumps2,614 2727 4545
Hydro659 917 17
Landfill gas415 1571 71
Onshore wind248145 145329 329
Sewage gas41236814
Solar PV – ground193418 418403 403
Solar PV – roof23,834121 121117 117
Solar thermal1,079 44 33
Total29,4747401518911,0854221,507
Table 1: Renewable and waste generated energy in Devon in 2017/1816

The total 1,085GWh of electricity generated represents 32% of Devon’s 2017 electricity consumption (3,361GWh)17.

Devon’s renewable energy resource potential has not been assessed since 201118when earlier resource assessment work in 2005, 2006 and 2010 was summarised. PV and wind were identified as the dominant technologies. However, PV (419MW resource) was assumed to be constrained to roof mounted arrays. A range of “constrained”19 wind resource was identified from 559MW to 1,993 MW. More recent resource assessment for the Greater Exeter Strategic Plan (GESP) area, which includes East Devon, Exeter, Teignbridge and Mid Devon identified 212 MW of unconstrained wind capacity

and 3,729 MW of unconstrained PV capacity[1]. Simply pro-rating theses figure to the whole of Devon[2] gives around 600 MW of wind and 10 GW of PV. Applying the same load factors as in the table above gives generation of 1,300 GWh from wind and 9,600 GWh from PV, a total of 10,900 GWh or ten times current generation. On this basis Devon has the resources to become a net electricity exporter.

The land area required for energy production from a range of renewable energy technologies in summarised in Table 2.

TechnologyAnnual energy per hectare (MWh)
Solar thermal (including storage)1,523
Solar PV389
Woodfuel (from forestry)2.5
Biogas (from maize)60
Wind519
Table 2: Calculated factors for annual energy per hectare (source CEE22)

On this basis the land required for 1,300 GWh of wind and 9,600 GWh of PV is 2,505 ha and 24,678ha respectively or 0.4% and 3.7% of Devon’s land area.

4.7.2 Plymouth

Renewable and waste generated electricity in Plymouth is summarised in Table 3 and represents 16% of Plymouth’s 2017 electricity consumption (910,093 MWh)23.

TechnologyInstallations    CapacityGeneration
  MWMWh%
Photovoltaics (PV)6,09526.3824,12416.9%
Wind20.04940.1%
Hydro and marine10.401,0110.7%
Sewage gas10.279190.6%
Landfill gas37.3924,65517.3%
Energy from waste (EfW)122.5070,81349.7%
Biomass25.4320,85514.6%
Total6,10562.41142,471 
Table 3: Renewable electricity in Plymouth in 201724


Over two thirds of electricity generated is from the waste sector (sewage gas, landfill gas and EfW). Future expansion of these sources is unlikely, indeed as Plymouth’s landfill sites age, generation of methane from landfill will fall over time.

Otherwise, Plymouth’s urban environment presents challenges for deployment of the most cost effective large scale renewable energy generation technologies, large scale onshore wind and ground mounted PV arrays. If electricity demand in Plymouth doubles by 2050, as is predicted nationally, consumption in 2050 will be 1,820 GWh.

Earlier estimates25 of potential future renewable energy in Plymouth, combined with the assumed current figures for EfW and biomass give the total potential of 280GWh (see Table 4). If this potential is developed by 2050 Plymouth will be producing 15% of its electricity needs, similar to today.

TechnologyGeneration
MWh%
Photovoltaics (PV)156,20056%
Wind5,0002%
Hydro and marine7,0003%
Sewage gas3,5001%
Landfill gas15,8006%
Energy from waste (EfW)70,81325%
Biomass20,8557%
Total279,168 
Table 4: Renewable electricity potential in Plymouth

The majority of the additional renewable electricity deployment is solar PV comprising 34,000 installations, over 90% of which (31,000) are on homes representing 26% of the projected 2050 Plymouth housing stock26.

4.7.3 Torbay

A 2016 study into energy opportunities27 concluded that Torbay has few energy assets either on the demand28 or supply side29 that would allow renewable energy projects to be developed at scale. At that time Torbay had 6.4 MW of solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity installed under the Government’s Feed in Tariff (FiT) regime. When the FiT scheme came to an end in March 2019 this had increased to 7.8 MW generated from 1867 domestic and 67 commercial installations. Assuming a typical PV load factor of 11%, this capacity would generate 7.6 GWh or 1.7% of Torbay’s 444 GWh 2016 electricity consumption. Installations under the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) are far fewer with installations and installed capacity increasing from 28 to 41 and 1.0 MW to 1.4 MW respectively and capable of generating  only a very small faction of Torbay’s’ annual heat demand. A desktop review of the potential for larger scale wind and solar PV in Torbay identifies the potential to generate up to 43 GWh. This generation potential represents some 10% of Torbay’s current electricity consumption. 

GHG emissions arise from buildings (of all types including domestic, commercial, public sector etc.) both from the direct combustion of fossil fuels (mainly for space heating), and from the use of electricity to power lighting and equipment. The consumption of electricity is covered in Section 4 (Power) and so this section covers only direct emissions. The projected trajectory for GHG emissions from buildings is shown in Figure 10 (values for 2016, 2032 and 2050 are provided in Appendix A). 

Figure 10: Projected GHG emissions in DPT’s Buildings sector to 2050 as a result of national policy (interpretation of graph is described in caption to Figure 1)

The majority of emissions associated with the Buildings sector are due to the requirement for space heating (emissions associated with electricity consumption are covered in the Power sector). Reducing emissions arising from space heating relies on both reducing demand through efficiency measures, and supplying any required heat using low-carbon technologies. The approach will differ depending on whether the building is a new build or existing, and whether it is on the gas grid or not (19% of DPT’s homes are off-gas compared to 16% nationally although the figure in Devon is 26%). The different approaches are highlighted in Figure 11 which identifies that for existing buildings in addition to improving the building fabric, low-regret measures for heating technology include heat pumps30 in off-gas properties and heat networks in on-gas locations. A significant gap has been identified for on-gas properties where heat networks are not viable, with a potential technological solution being hybrid-heat pumps (potentially in conjunction with hydrogen). In order to decarbonise emissions due to space heating in the Buildings sector, the CCC scenarios (discussed below) assume a high take-up of efficiency measures (including retrofit), and the full uptake of a low-carbon heating technology in all dwellings. This includes those that are space constrained where innovative heat pump solutions are assumed to become available, and heritage buildings which would be heated by (expensive) direct electric heating. For DPT, ultimately this will mean implementing all “easy” retrofit measure (lofts and cavity walls), insulating most (over 70%) of solid walls, and ensuring all dwellings are heated using a low-carbon (including direct electric heating) technology.

Figure 11: Low-regret measures and remaining challenges for existing buildings on the UK gas grid31

The CCC’s least cost pathway implies a national reduction in emissions of 20% between 2016 and 2030 (Figure 12). This is envisaged to be achieved through a combination of demand reduction, and supply of low-carbon heat.

Figure 12: CCC indicators for UK buildings32

For DPT, this implies:

  • Improvements to existing heating systems
  • The insulation of all practicable lofts by 2022 (the end date for the Government’s proposed third Energy Company Obligation programme) and all cavity walls by 2030
  • The insulation of 36,000 solid walls by 203033
  • All new buildings to be highly efficient from the offset and low-carbon heat ready
  • 13,300 heat pumps (which will run off decarbonised grid electricity) in new homes by 203234
  • 31,400 heat pumps in existing homes by 203235 (for context, apportioning the national deployment rate by population results in 18,100 heat pumps in existing homes by 2030).
  • 11,200 heat pumps in non-residential buildings36
  • 437 GWh bio-methane injected to the gas grid to account for DPT’s share37 of the national target by 203038
  • 874 GWh heat from low-carbon heat networks to account for DPT’s share39 of the national target by 2030.

5.1 Low risk policy to 2032

Low risk policies are responsible for 14% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Energy efficiency:
    • Extending support for home efficiency improvements out to 2028 at the current level of Energy Company Obligation (ECO) funding.
    • A new energy and carbon reporting framework for the commercial sector.
  • New Buildings:
    • Ensuring new buildings are future-proofed for low-carbon heat by 2020.
    • In May 2018 a ‘Grand Challenge’ mission was announced to at least halve the energy use of new buildings by 2030, including making sure every new building in Britain uses clean heating.
  • Low-carbon heat:
    • Increased refinement of the Heat Networks Investment Project (HNIP).
    • Refocused regulations around the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI)40.
    • New standards introduced for domestic boiler installations.

5.2 Medium risk policy to 2032

Medium risk policies are responsible for 14% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Building-scale low-carbon heat options in existing buildings to 2021: The refocussed RHI still requires action to address upfront cost barriers and raising awareness.
  • Heat networks to 2021: There are risks that the focus of HNIP remains around gas CHP rather than low-carbon sources such as energy from wastes, heat pumps etc..
  • Hydrogen: Funding has been announced though a governance framework is required to progress the hydrogen agenda.
  • Residential energy efficiency, low income: Risks around the delivery of ECO3.
  • Non-residential energy efficiency: Whilst there is a commitment to improve non-residential energy efficiency by 20% there is no policy to drive this.

5.3 High risk policy to 2032

High risk policies are responsible for 45% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Building-scale low-carbon heat options in existing buildings from 2021: There is an ambition to phase out high-carbon heating and to bring forward more low-carbon heat networks. However, there is no firm policy to deliver this post-2021.
  • Standards for new-build to drive low-carbon heat and energy efficiency: A mission statement has been announced though policy development is required for delivery.
  • Residential energy efficiency, able-to-pay: Policy is required for able-to-pay sectors and social housing sectors, and greater ambition is required for the private rented sector.

5.4 Policy gap risk policy to 2032

Policy gaps are responsible for 27% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • A stable framework and direction of travel for improving energy and carbon efficiency, focused on real-world performance. Government needs to:
    • Develop policies to achieve EPC ratings of C for dwellings, including a delivery mechanism for social housing.
    • Address delivery risks in private rented sector, in particular exemptions capping contributions from landlords to improve the energy efficiency of EPC F and G rated properties.
    • Set out concrete policies to deliver the ambition on non-residential buildings.
    • Introduce voluntary public sector targets.
    • Introduce a second wave phase of standards for boiler efficiencies.
    • Strengthen standards for new buildings (residential and non-domestic buildings).
    • Reform monitoring metrics and certification and strengthening compliance and enforcement frameworks to ensure that compliance calculations are representative of the real-world performance of buildings.
    • Developing a long-term heat networks policy framework.
    • Inclusion of details of a national governance framework to drive decisions on heat infrastructure (e,g, heat networks and/or electrification and/or decarbonisation of the gas grid) in the early 2020s.
  • Consistent price signals that clearly encourage affordable, low-carbon choices for consumers relies on Government:
    • Publishing detailed plans to phase out the installation of high-carbon fossil fuel heating in the 2020s including large heat pumps displacing resistive electric heating in non-residential buildings.
    • Establishing support framework for heat pumps and bio-methane post-2021, as well as support for low-carbon technologies in heat networks.
    • Reviewing the balance of tax and regulatory costs across fuels in order to improve alignment with implicit carbon prices and reflect the decarbonisation of electricity.
  • An attractive and well-timed offer to households and SMEs that is aligned to ‘trigger points’ along with simple, highly visible information, certification and installer training. To achieve this Government needs to:
    • Set out policy package for able-to-pay and address delivery risks around ECO.
    • Implement measures around green mortgages and fiscal incentives to encourage uptake and support financing of upfront costs.
    • Develop new policy to support SMEs.
    • Improving consumer access to data and advice such as Green Building Passports and improving EPCs and access to data underpinning EPCs and SAP.
    • Drive wider use of operational data for benchmarking in the public and commercial sectors by strengthening and extending mandatory public reporting of operational energy ratings.
    • Review professional standards and skills across the building and heat supply trades.

5.5 Core scenario to 2050

The CCC has identified the following core options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • Energy efficiency:
    • A mix of insulation measures providing 21% reduction in energy demand in homes.
    • A 25% reduction in non-domestic heat demand due to energy efficiency savings.
  • Low-carbon heating:
    • Low-carbon heat networks being deployed in heat dense areas with the connection of 5 million homes nationally by 2050 (91,000 in DPT41) and 46% of heat demand from non-domestic buildings being met via these networks.
    • Heat pumps serving 17 million homes nationally by 2050 (308,000 in DPT42) using heat pumps of various type, and meeting 54% of heat demand from non-domestic buildings by 2045 for all buildings currently not heated using biomass (with those biomass systems being replaced by heat pumps in 2050).
    • A small number of homes nationally (1,000) using direct electric heating.
  • Lighting and Appliances: Whilst electricity consumption is quantified in the Power section, it has been assumed that there are significant improvements to the efficiency of lighting (e.g. LED) and appliances for both dwellings and non-domestic buildings. In addition, it is assumed that from 2030 all cooker replacements are electric.
  • Delivering current Government commitments on:
    • Retrofitting homes to EPC rating C by 2035.
    • The Future Home Standard for new homes by 2025.
    • Phasing out high-carbon fossil fuel heating in homes off the gas grid in the 2020s.
    • Build and extend heat networks across the country.

Funding of low-carbon heating beyond 2020/21.

5.6 Further ambition to 2050

The CCC has identified the following further ambition options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • Energy efficiency: A mix of insulation measures providing 25% reduction in energy demand in homes.
    • 6 million cavity wall insulations by 2050 (109,000 in DPT43)
    • 6 million solid wall insulations by 2050 (109,000 in DPT44)
  • Heat pumps:
    • 19 million homes (i.e. 2 million more than under the Core Scenario) nationally (344,000 in DPT42) using heat pumps.
    • There is uncertainty as to which technology will prevail as hybrid heat pumps, full electrification and hydrogen boilers are currently projected to have similar costs.
  • Low-carbon heat networks: It is assumed that rather than using gas to meet peak demand on heat networks it is replaced with either larger heat pumps and large water stores, or hydrogen if available through the gas grid.
  • The scope of delivering carbon reduction in dwellings is extended to:
    • Homes on the gas grid with space constraints (about 20% of dwellings, which were excluded in the Core Scenario)
    • Dwellings with heritage value (either being listed or in a conservation area).
    • Addressing these dwellings is likely to be technically feasible but costly or difficult zero emissions may not occur until 2060.
  • Hydrogen: The conversion of residual gas demand to hydrogen which has been produced with CCS, requiring a significant national infrastructure delivery programme and dwellings being fitted with hydrogen-ready boilers.
  • Nitrous oxide used as an anaesthetic would become more significant once buildings are decarbonised. The CCC estimate that in 2050 emissions from this source could be 0.6 MtCO2e nationally, which if apportioned to DPT would be over 10,800 tCO2e and represent 12% of emissions from the Buildings sector (although only 0.6% of DPT’s residual emissions as the Buildings sector will become relatively less significant due to its projected deep decarbonisation). It is stated that nitrous oxide could potentially be replaced with xenon gas though this is currently 1,000 times more expensive than nitrous oxide.

5.7 Opportunities for accelerated delivery in DPT

Based on projected and proposed action that would be required to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the following would need to be adopted or considered in DPT if a target of 2030 is required:

5.7.1 Buildings

The Government’s Future Homes Standard is set to ensure all new homes are built without fossil fuel heating and to a “world-leading” energy efficiency standard by 2025. Meeting challenging carbon reduction targets for the buildings sector requires that new buildings do not result in any additional emissions in-use. It has been shown45 that for a large volume housebuilder the average cost of a new dwelling is £215,000 of which 30% is profit (£65,000). The CCC has estimated that the additional cost of delivering a zero-carbon dwelling to be £4,800 with industry estimates varying from £8,000 to £12,000 with the potential to meet the CCC estimate at volume. It would therefore appear to be economically viable to require all new dwellings to achieve “zero-carbon” now. This should be mandated through planning policy. Accelerating the requirement for net zero homes ahead of the national timetable (including any development in the pipeline that has permission under earlier versions of Part L of the Building Regulations) will reduce Devon’s emissions. A similar requirement would need to be made of non-domestic buildings.

5.7.2. Energy efficiency in existing buildings

Meeting the implied trajectory of energy efficiency to dwellings by 2030 would imply an installation rate of 10,000 cavity wall and 9,000 solid wall installations per annum in DPT.  The current national rate of installation of wall insulation was 18,000 in 2018 and 16,000 in 2017 for solid wall insulation and 269,000 in 2018 and 258,000 in 2017 for cavity wall insulation respectively46. The data does not separate installed measures by local authority, but these rates if apportioned by population would result in installed rates of 320 and 4,840 for SWI and CWI in DPT in 2018 respectively. This equates to a shortfall of almost 8,750 SWI and 5,170 CWI installations per annum, which at installation costs of £13,000 and £475 per property for SWI and CWI respectively47 would require an additional £114 million and £2.5 million annually. This is a significantly higher rate than is currently being achieved. For example, in 2017 the CCC reported there were only 70,000 cavity wall and 16,000 solid wall installations in the entire country, indicating the low level of activity being delivered with current ECO funding. As the ‘low hanging fruit’ has been harvested, install rates for standard cavities are falling as they are harder to find and less attractive to installers due to their dispersed nature, whilst the costs and complexity in addressing future nonstandard cavities/solid wall measures remain high and in many cases unacceptable to homeowners. For Devon to accelerate ahead of the national trajectory would require means of funding these measures directly, as well as having the available supply chains and workforce in place to deliver the measures.

For non-domestic buildings, a 25% reduction in heat demand has been assumed by the CCC, though clarity has not been given as to how this might occur. In practical terms, it would require organisations (or in many cases, their landlords), to invest in efficiency measures such as insulation and/or building services.

The Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard (MEES) requires privately rented properties– both residential and non-domestic – to improve the efficiency of any building that has an EPC rating of F or G, however there is a spending cap which limits the impact of the policy. Any significant shift in addressing the private landlord sector will need to be balanced with effective policies which balance the interests of both the landlord and tenant if there is not to be an adverse impact in the rise of evictions as landlords seek to either recoup the costs of investment or divest properties to avoid costs. As there is no sufficiently effective policy or funding mechanism, additional funding would be needed achieve the 25% target.

5.7.3 Low-carbon heating and bio-methane

The 2050 scenarios assume that heat sources have effectively been decarbonised. The broad strategy is to connect buildings in areas of high heat demand to low carbon heat networks fed by large heat pumps, and to fit heat pumps to buildings where this is less suitable. To achieve Net Zero will require adopting this approach even for dwellings that are space constrained, or that have heritage value. These technological approaches rely on the electricity grid being decarbonised (so that heat produced from heat pumps is Net Zero), and that technology and infrastructure has developed sufficiently that hybrid heat pumps and hydrogen are a credible contributory option to the strategy. It is not considered feasible for DPT to unilaterally bring forward low carbon hydrogen, and so Net Zero heat options for DPT by 2030 rely on a switch to heat pumps, either building-scale or as part of low carbon heat networks. This assumes an annual DPT installation rate of around 36,000 heat pumps per annum and that the electricity grid will have broadly decarbonised by 2030. If the 2016 national number is apportioned based on population then this would imply an annual installation rate for DPT of 320 heat pumps which is 0.9% of the required rate. Assuming an ASHP costs £7,00048 (note: GSHP are stated to be double the cost) this would imply an additional spend of £249 million annually to install standalone in residential properties heat pumps at this rate. These installations should occur alongside the proposed energy efficiency improvements, and there may be an advantage in combining the two.

The CCC includes the potential for bio-methane’s role in decarbonising heat, through injection into the gas grid, under Buildings. Bio-methane’s relatively small role is illustrated by the blue rectangle in Figure 11. The CCC report that 2TWh of bio-methane are currently injected into the gas grid annually with use in buildings rising to 20TWh by 2032. Industrial use of bio methane increases total use to 25TWh. Were this bio-methane to be provided from energy crops (maize at 60MWh/ha see Table 2) the UK land requirements would be some 417,000ha or 1.7% of the UK’s land area.

5.7.4. Lightning and appliances

Although emissions from electricity are considered in the power sector, the projections for buildings include demand reduction associated with efficiency savings of lighting and appliances, including a switch to electric heating for cooking (e.g. using induction hobs). These advances are being achieved through research and commercialisation at a global scale. Whilst national/European policy such as energy labelling provides consumers with the information to include energy efficiency within their decision making process, ultimately this is an area that is being led by actions above local authority area. Whilst the DPT local authorities or agencies within DPT could develop campaigns to promote the benefits of more efficient lighting and equipment, this does not appear to be an area where it would be possible for DPT to significantly accelerate carbon reduction relative to the national projections.

It should be noted that the CCC’s Industry sector represents primarily heavy industry. GHG emissions arise from heavy industry both from the direct combustion of fossil fuels (mainly for process use and heating49), other process emissions and from the use of electricity to power processes, equipment and lighting. The consumption of electricity is covered in Section 4 (Power) and so this section covers only direct emissions. Emissions from buildings which may be part of industrial businesses fall under Section 5 (Buildings). The projected trajectory for GHG emissions from heavy industry in Devon is shown in Figure 13 (values for 2016, 2032 and 2050 are provided in Appendix A).

Figure 13: Projected GHG emissions in Devon’s Heavy Industry sector to 2050 as a result of national policy (interpretation of graph is described in caption to Figure 1)

It should be noted that DPT’s heavy industry emission are largely comprised of the “Large Industrial Installations” category in the BEIS Local Authority CO2 emission statistics. The lack of heavy industry in DPT means that these represent a very small portion of Devon’s emissions.  However, significant emissions from intermediate size commercial and industrial sites are recorded in the “Industry and Commercial Gas” category which is included the Buildings section of this analysis.

The CCC’s least cost pathway for Industry anticipates emissions falling by 23% between 2017 and 2030 through carbon capture and storage (CCS), bio-energy, electrification and energy efficiency as shown in Figure 14.

Figure 14: CCC indicators for UK industry to 203050

The Net Zero report forecasts emissions for five specific high emission industrial sectors:

  • Cement
  • Petrochemicals and ammonia
  • Iron and steel
  • Refining
  • Fossil fuel production – combustion

DPT has no material petrochemicals and ammonia, iron and steel, cement, refining or fossil fuel production.

Of the remaining categories the bulk of DPT’s emission are assumed to fall under stationary combustion from other manufacturing and other process emissions. These sectors comprised 33% of UK industrial emissions in 201651. For DPT’s industry this implies opportunities for carbon emission reductions result from:

  • Energy efficiency
  • Bio-energy for heat
  • Electrification of heat

6.1 Low risk policy to 2032

Low risk policies are responsible for 8% of DPT’s projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Energy efficiency improvements where the abatement levels achieved to date are modest.
  • Low-carbon bioenergy and heat through the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) which supports low-carbon heat uptake in industry and is the largest single implemented policy for industry. Nationally the RHI is expected to encourage around 2 MtCO2e/year of abatement between 2020 and 2030.

6.2 Medium risk policy to 2032

Medium risk policies include emission reductions from existing Government policies that the CCC views to have significant delivery risks (e.g. insufficient funding). Medium risk policies are responsible for 17% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Further energy efficiency
  • The funding of  the RHI beyond 2020/21
  • Continued participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)

The EU ETS, while nationally very important, currently only affects one of Devon’s industrial businesses; Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd.

6.3 High risk policy to 2032

High risk policies are responsible for 55% of projected carbon reduction to 2032.

The CCC considers emissions reductions from the proposals and intentions included in the Government’s 2018 Clean Growth Strategy to be ‘high risk’ due to the lack of clear policy required to deliver them. These include:

  • A 20% improvement in industrial energy efficiency
  • Phasing out high-carbon fossil fuel heating in industrial buildings off the gas grid
  • Industrial carbon capture and storage (CCS)

Industrial scale CCS is likely to be focussed on energy intensive industrial clusters on the eastern seaboard of the UK.

6.4 Policy gap risk policy to 2032

Policy gaps are responsible for 20% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has highlighted that the Government has no clear proposals to support a switch to low-carbon fuels for industrial process heat after 2021.

Low carbon fuels include electrification, biomass, bio-methane, hydrogen and ammonia. Electrification takes advantage of the declining emission factor in the power sector as the grid decarbonises (see Section 4).  Electrification is preferred to biomass which will be directed towards locations where CCS is available (BECCS) thereby enabling CO2 to be removed from the atmosphere. Bio-methane from anaerobic digestion is likely to be injected into the gas grid. However, the limited quantities of bio-methane available will only marginally reduce the gas grid emission factor nationally. Hydrogen is anticipated to be generated primarily through the reforming of methane with the by-product CO2 being sequestered through CCS. The bulk of hydrogen production is therefore likely to take place in industrial clusters on the eastern seaboard of the UK. Hydrogen will either be used locally or made available nationally through the gas grid. Local zero carbon hydrogen generation is possible using electrolysis with renewable electricity. However, there are significant technical, safety and cost barriers to the deployment of hydrogen (see Section 4) making it difficult to foresee the national roll-out and therefore to make predictions about the penetration of hydrogen in Devon. Ammonia has a higher energy density than hydrogen and the advantage of being more easily transportable in a liquid state. As with hydrogen, the large scale generation, distribution and use of ammonia as a fuel and consequently it impact on emissions in DPT is currently difficult to foresee.

6.5 Core scenario to 2050

Figure 15 shows the CCC’s national emissions reduction scenarios which are dominated by sectors not present in DPT. The industrial mix in DPT means that the DPT’s priority will need to be energy and resource efficiency and the transition to low carbon electricity and fuels.

Figure 15: CCC national scenarios for very deep emission reduction in UK industry52

6.6 Further ambition to 2050

The further Ambition Scenario continues emissions reduction beyond 80% by 2050 through a range of options including:

  • Further use of hydrogen
  • Further electrification
  • CCS (including biomass energy with CCS)
  • Low-carbon off-road mobile machinery (e.g. hydrogen or electrification)
  • Reductions in methane venting and leakage
  • Energy and resource efficiency.

Further Ambition in DPT will mean going further with energy and resource efficiency and the transition to low carbon electricity and fuels.

Speculative Options in the industrial sector identified by the CCC include:

  • Further CCS including from smaller more challenging sites
  • Faster deployment of low carbon fuelled technologies partially through earlier scrapping of assets

Given the earlier push towards the conversion to low carbon fuels in Devon it is difficult to assess the extent to which Devon’s industry would require localised CCS or the earlier scrapping of industrial assets.

6.7 Opportunities for accelerated delivery in DPT

Understanding DPT’s industrial emissions in Figure 13 requires a knowledge of the types of industrial activity. An indication of the types of businesses and employment prevalent in DPT is shown in Figure 16 and 17.

Figure 16: The number of businesses by industry sector in DPT compared to the South West and the UK53
Figure 17: The number of employees by industry sector in DPT compared to the South West and the UK54

When sectors where emissions will be primarily from buildings (Section 5), transport (Section 7) and agriculture (Section 8) are excluded, the residual sectors are construction and production.  In both these sectors businesses numbers and employment percentages are near the regional and national averages. These observations provide little additional clarity on industrial emission sources.

Larger industrial production sites are identified in the EU Emissions Trading National Allocation Plan55 (EU ETS NAP) and the National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (NAEI) point source emission inventory.56

The NAP includes both Scope 1 and 2 (indirect) emissions from company sites country wide. The following industrial sector companies which have sites in Devon are listed; Arconic (Exeter), BCT (Heathfield in administration), Dairy Crest (Crediton), Devon Valley (Hele), Higher Kings Mill (Collompton), Norbord (South Molton), Premier Foods (Lifton).

Direct emission for all these companies, excluding Arconic, are recorded on the NAEI inventory and summarised in Table 5. Arconic is not included because its main energy use is served by electricity.

DistrictCompanySiteIndustry sectorGHG emissions tCO2e
TeignbridgeBritish Ceramic Tile LtdHeathfieldOther mineral40,562
West DevonPremier Foods Group LtdAmbrosia CreameryFood, drink & tobacco16,813
Mid DevonHigher Kings Mill LtdCullomptonPaper, printing & publishing9,287
South HamsImerys Minerals LtdLee Moor SiteOther mineral8,603
Mid DevonDevon Valley LtdDevon Valley MillPaper, printing & publishing5,962
Mid DevonAggregate Industries UK LtdWestleigh AsphaltOther mineral5,102
North DevonNorbord Europe LtdSouth MoltonOther2,908
TorridgeDartingtonTorringtonOther mineral96
Table 5: NAEI industrial sites in Devon 2017

NAEI industrial emission in Devon total 89,332 tCO2e. In Plymouth the only industrial site included in the NAEI is Moorcroft Asphalt which has emissions of 5,260 ktCO2e in 2017. Torbay has no sites listed in the NAEI. Total emissions for the nine NAEI sites in DPT are 94,592, significantly more than the 42,674 tCO2e recorded in the 2016 inventory. This discrepancy is due to the allocation of emission between Industry and Buildings in the inventory described above. The Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) Energy Efficiency Scheme league table57 records emissions from numerous companies which have operations in DPT. However, these emissions include both Scope 1 and 2 and are further complicated by many of the companies having other sites outside DPT. This means that the league table of little use in determining the proportion of direct emissions that arise from industrial sites in DPT.

The CCC’s scenarios for the decarbonisation of industry involve two key national measures which are relevant in DPT; the provision of low and Net Zero electricity (covered in Section 4) and the supply of low and Net Zero fuels (including hydrogen and ammonia). Equally, the significant improvement in industrial energy efficiency foreseen will rely on strong national policy which delivers the required incentives and regulations.

Materially accelerating the national programme will require additional funding. However, the design of any DPT specific measures will need to ensure that they do not incur “carbon leakage” i.e. significantly raise costs for DPT’s industry reducing profitability or increasing output prices both of which potentially risk driving industry out of DPT. Measures are therefore likely to need to be taxpayer funded either through local taxation in DPT or from external Government sources. The case for acceleration will therefore need to be made either to DPT’s taxpayers or the Government. Assuming that the national programme is pursuing the least cost pathway making the case for additional costs for acceleration in DPT will be challenging.

A Climate Emergency gives the Council a mandate to convey the concern of citizens to DPT’s industry. This will require getting closer to and deepening the understanding of industry across the DPT. This might take the form of a specialist unit which would develop relationships with the larger emitters in DPT and run a programme to reach smaller industrial emitters based on a detailed understanding of DPT’s industry.

In parallel with developing this industrial insight the unit could work with planners to develop appropriate low carbon industrial zones (LCIZ) in DPT. LCIZ’s would provide low carbon energy and emission mitigation measures to the industries locating in them and would be places were both new and existing DPT industries would be encouraged to locate / relocate to. LCIZs would offer long term carbon cost benefits by mitigating national carbon taxes. In the short term, to accelerate the take up, the districts could also incentivise industrial businesses locating in the LCIZs through business rate reductions and other financial and regulatory incentives. The sites for such zones will be specific and may be based on the resources and a particular industry sector(s) requires e.g. raw materials, renewable energy etc. or a geographical feature .e.g. remoteness, transport links, etc. LCIZs could also have a key part in providing places where DPT can take advantage of the opportunities presented by the transition to new large scale technologies such as hydrogen, ammonia and synthetic fuels as these and the other technologies involved in Net Zero become apparent.

Transport GHG emissions generally arise from the direct combustion of fossil fuels across the different modes. The projected trajectory for GHG emissions from transport (excluding aviation and shipping) is shown in Figure 18 (values for 2016, 2032 and 2050 are provided in Appendix A)58.

Figure 18: Projected GHG emissions in DPT’s Transport sector to 2050 as a result of national policy (interpretation of graph is described in caption to Figure 1)

The CCC’s least cost pathway implies a reduction in emissions of 46% between 2017 and 2030. This reduction is envisaged through a combination of reducing the carbon intensity of transport modes, and demand reduction as shown in Figure 19:

  • Increased uptake of electric vehicles, with 60% of new cars to be electric in 2030.
  • Continual improvement in carbon intensity of non-electric vehicles.
  • Increasing the fraction of sustainable biofuels in road fuel to 11% (by energy) in 2030 (from 2.3% in 2017).
  • Improving the efficiency of freighting.
  • Shifting travel to more sustainable modes.
Figure 19: CCC indicators for the UK transport sector59

7.1 Low risk policy to 2032

Low risk policies are responsible for 8% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Biofuels: The new Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) target has been legislated.
  • Sustainable travel: The Transforming Cities fund which aims to improve productivity and spread prosperity through investment in public and sustainable transport in some of the largest English County regions has been launched.

7.2 Medium risk policy to 2032

Medium risk policies are responsible for 37% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • New car and van efficiency to 2020: There is uncertainty as to the extent emissions savings will be realised in the real world.
  • Electric vehicles: There is uncertainty regarding commitments to grants in the longer term for EVs, and the limited progress in developing on-street charging infrastructure.
  • HGV and freight efficiency: New efficiencies have been proposed but there has been no clarity over the UK regulatory approach.

7.3 High risk policy to 2032

High risk policies are responsible for 30% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • New car and van efficiency after 2020: The EU has proposed targets post-2020 which in themselves are not deemed to be sufficiently ambitious, though regardless of this the UK’s intention to proceed post-Brexit is uncertain.

7.4 Policy gap risk policy to 2032

Policy gaps are responsible for 24% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • New car and van efficiency:
    • Setting out a regulatory approach post-Brexit including punitive penalties for manufacturer non-compliance.
    • More stretching targets for new car and van emissions for 2025 and 2030, based on real-world performance.
  • Electric vehicles:
    • Set more stretching targets for new EV sales i.e. 60% of all cars and vans in 2030 as opposed to 40—60% cars and 40% vans as targeted by the Clean Growth Strategy.
    • Ensure adequate charging infrastructure by mandating charging provision for all new development (homes and non-domestic).
    • Improve access to the electricity grid for charge point providers.
    • Ensure plug-in hybrid vehicles achieve near-zero emission by 2035 by increasing the range of the electric component of the journey.
  • Fiscal incentives: Implement stronger incentives e.g. via vehicle excise duty and company car tax to encourage purchase of ultra-low emission vehicles.
  • Modal shift: Increase levels of walking, cycling and public transport use—especially in cities—by planning new development with sustainable transport as a priority as well as investing in new infrastructure and promotional campaigns.
  • HGVs and freight:
    • Setting out a regulatory approach post-Brexit including more stretching targets for new car and van emissions for 2025 and 2030 (15% and 30% reductions respectively from a 2019 baseline), based on real-world performance.
    • Shifting more freight from road to rail by improving logistics efficiency.

Investigating barriers that have currently prevented manufacturers from making lower carbon HGVs available through the government’s OLEV funding route.

7.5 Core scenario to 2050

The CCC has identified the following core options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • Electric vehicles: The Core Scenario assumes sales of conventional cars and vans ends in 2040 resulting in 80% of the national fleet being zero-emissions by 2050 given expected vehicle lifetimes and turnover rates. The scenario also includes increased uptake of ultra-low emissions small HGVs and ongoing subsidy of zero emission motorbikes. Based on apportioning[1] costs and uptake of charging infrastructure from the Net Zero report this implies a spend in DPT of £5.4 million per annum from now to 2050 to result in a total of approximately 1020 x 22 kW chargers, 920 x 43 kW chargers, 1900 x 150 kW chargers and 38 x 350 kW chargers. Nationally, 20% of target 22 kW chargers have been installed, and 9% of 42 kW chargers, with 0% for the larger capacity chargers. Western Power Distribution (WPD) has produced a strategy[2] which outlines the work it is doing locally to prepare for the shift to electric vehicles. It is stated that the existing network is likely to have the capacity to support charging of EVs at expected rates. Domestic chargers with 3 kW or 3.7 kW capacities can be simply connected and it is not envisaged there will be a charge by WPD. At a national level, 60% of cars are parked off-road and would therefore be suitable for this type of charger (around 352,000 households in DPT in 2050 with a “slow” charger). Chargers of 7 kW or greater are likely to require some network upgrading and will incur a cost (e.g. £1,000 to £3,000 for a 7 kW charger). Chargers in the range 3.7 kW to 22 kW may be installed street side to meet the needs of those households that do not have off street parking, whilst chargers of 22 kW and above will be installed in public places.
  • Walking and cycling: It is assumed that 5% by distance of car journeys can be shifted to walking, cycling and public transport.
  • Freight: The industry has a target of 15% reduction in emissions from HGVs by 2025 from 2015 levels to be achieved via logistics measures (6 – 8% reduction in distance travelled), improved fuel efficiency and ultra-low emission vehicles.
  • Buses: Low emission buses to make up 80% of sales in 2050.

7.6 Further ambition to 2050

The CCC has identified the following further ambition options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • Electric vehicles: The Further Ambition Scenario assumes the planned ending of sales of conventional cars and vans is brought forward to 2035 including for hybrid vehicles, with limited regulatory approval of fossil fuel cars from 2050. The introduction of Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) could enable a faster transition to electric vehicles, if operated by businesses as fleets of taxis. Shared ‘on demand’ fleets of electric vehicles with increased occupancy could reduce global energy demand for transport, as well as reducing the number of electric vehicles on the road.
  • HGVs: It is assumed that all HGV sales will be of low-emission varieties from 2040. For small rigid HGVs electrification is likely to be the appropriate technology, though for larger rigid and articulated HGVs choices include either hydrogen or electrification. The cost of bringing forward hydrogen refuelling infrastructure is in the same order of magnitude as the capital cost of developing electric charging infrastructure (i.e. £9.3 billion total spend nationally for electric chargers in public spaces compared to an estimated range of £3 — £16 billion to 2050 for hydrogen refuelling infrastructure.
  • Walking and cycling: It is assumed that 10% by distance (i.e. double the uptake compared to the Core Scenario) of car journeys can be shifted to walking, cycling and public transport. If increased modal shift could be achieved (e.g. due to the benefits of electric bikes and scooters) then this may mean that the uptake of EVs could be less aggressive than modelled.
  • Freight: Distance travelled reduced 10% by logistics measures including the expanded use of urban consolidation centres and expanded delivery windows. It is stated that societal changes to consumption (e.g. increased longevity of goods, or manufacturing close to point of use via 3D printing) represents an alternative potential means of reducing demand from freight.
  • Railways: It is assumed that 54% of track is electrified by 2040 (generally the most busy lines) with hydrogen trains deployed on trains operated under 75 mph on lines that are not electrified.
  • Synthetic Fuels: It is stated that there is a possibility that any remaining fossil fuels used in the surface transport sector could be replaced with synthetic fuels, made from electrolytic hydrogen and CO2 captured from the air via Direct Air Capture (DAC), though this is thought to be unlikely given high costs and competing demands for DAC with CCS as a means of carbon abatement.

7.7 Opportunities for accelerated delivery in DPT

Based on projected and proposed action that would be required to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the following would need to be adopted or considered in DPT if a target of 2030 is required:

  • Conventional cars and vans: The CCC state that the average lifespan of a car is 14 years, however some can remain on roads for over 20 years. Given the longer-term strategy for decarbonisation of vehicles involves electrification, this would imply that to meet a Net Zero target implies an immediate ban on the sale of conventional vehicles.  Local authorities do not have the powers to mandate such a change. In addition, the most advanced country internationally on bringing forward EVs (Norway), is targeting 2025 as the point at which fossil-fuel powered cars and vans will be banned. If conventional vehicles persist in DPT into the 2020s and 2030s, then achieving Net Zero would necessitate making deeper cuts elsewhere, including potentially offsetting.
  • Electric vehicles: Alongside a move away from internal combustion engines, EVs will need to effectively address a range of barriers if they are to be widely taken up in DPT ahead of national timetables:
    • Technology: EVs must meet the requirements of users. At present, the greatest barrier is battery capacity which limits the range of electric cars and vans. Whilst this will improve both with vehicle and charging technology, it is not an area DPT can unilaterally develop.
    • Costs: The CCC estimate that by 2030 a new medium sized battery car will be marginally lower to purchase (£160) than an equivalent conventional car and will save almost £2,000 over a 14 year lifetime. This would result in electric cars becoming cost-effective during the 2020s (or 2030 in the case of electric vans). In the meantime, to bridge any gap additional funding would be required. In the absence of national grants specifically available for DPT to meet a carbon target, these funds would need to be met locally.
    • Infrastructure: Based on the estimated extents of the charging infrastructure stated in Section 7.5 this would imply an annual spend of £15.2 million per annum between now and 2030 in DPT on charging infrastructure in public spaces. As much of this will be on very rapid chargers (150 and 350 kW) costs associated with being a first-mover may therefore be higher.
  • Modal shift: The CCC scenarios assume up to 10% modal shift (by distance travelled), which would need to be achieved at almost three times faster if Net Zero by 2030 is required.
  • Freight: The CCC scenarios are based on improvements to HGVs (both in vehicle design and in terms of switching to fuels such as hydrogen), both of which are cannot be directly influenced locally. Some of the reductions in emissions are associated with improvements in logistics, and so to that end DPT could proactively seek to work with bodies such as the Freight Transport Association and the Road Haulage Association as well as with major DPT’s hauliers and haulage clients directly.
  • Buses: The 2050 Core scenario assumes that low emission buses and coaches reach 80% of sales by 2050, although the CCC also states that accelerated roll-out of electric and hydrogen buses and coaches could reach 100% market share by 2040. Development of bus (and fuelling) technology is not an area DPT can achieve unilaterally, however there is evidence that these technologies are already being taken up and becoming cost-effective. The CCC states that for buses and urban distribution applications, electric vehicles in Sweden have already reached cost parity, and the Mayor of London62 has stated that in central London, all double-deck buses will be hybrid by 2019, all single-deck buses will emit zero exhaust emissions by 2020, and by 2037 at the latest, all 9,200 buses across London will be zero emission. So whilst there are technical solutions to address emissions from buses in DPT, the greatest barrier is how to fund a programme of replacement buses, especially given utilisation of buses will be significantly lower than in London, and the co-benefit drivers (i.e. improved air quality) are not as immediately pressing (although still important).
  • Railways: Savings from railways are projected to arise from electrification of the mainline and use of hydrogen trains on branch lines. The former will be achieved as a roll-out of national infrastructure whilst the latter is on the verge of being deployed in the UK (202263).

GHG emissions from the Agriculture, Land Use Change and Forestry sectors are considered together in the both the CCC reports, and so they are aggregated here. The projected trajectory for GHG emissions from these sectors is shown in Figure 20 (values for 2016, 2032 and 2050 are provided in Appendix A).

Figure 20: Projected GHG emissions in DPT’s Agriculture and Land Use Change sector to 2050 as a result of national policy (interpretation of graph is described in caption to Figure 1)

The CCC’s least cost pathway implies a reduction in emissions of 20% between 2016 and 2030. This is envisaged to be achieved through the following combination of reducing the carbon intensity of crops and livestock, and from changing the output of crops and livestock products as shown in Figure 21.

In DPT over the period to 2050, emissions from this sector are projected to fall from 1,590 ktCO2e in 2016 to 1,090 ktCO2e in 2050. In 2016 it was responsible for 19% of the overall GHG footprint, whilst in 2050 this would represent 57% of the residual emissions; a factor of almost two and a half times greater than the next largest sector (Transport, 24%). This would mean that even assuming decarbonisation can be achieved via interventions at the rate implied by the national programme, significant carbon offsetting will be required to achieve net-zero.

Key to understanding the nature of agricultural emissions and the potential impact of emissions reductions from the sector are facts that:

  • A significant proportion of agricultural emissions occur in the form of methane which is a short lived greenhouse gas.  The effect of these short-lived GHGs on global average temperature is much more closely controlled by their emissions rate as opposed to the cumulative total of emissions over time. As such in respect to DPT achieving carbon neutrality, methane emissions from agriculture do not necessarily need to be rapidly brought to net-zero, but rather stabilised and then slowly decreased to prevent continually increasing global average temperature. An alternative approach to measuring and reporting emissions from biological sources has been proposed by the New Zealand Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, this approaches’ relevance to DPT is considered in the Discussion section.
  • The agricultural sector and other land managers could play a major role in facilitating the sequestration of carbon to offset residual emissions.  The scale and nature of this opportunity is explored further in Section 11: Greenhouse Gas Removals.
Figure 21: CCC indicator national framework for the UK agriculture sector64

8.1 Low risk policy to 2032

The CCC has not identified any low risk policies. All carbon reduction identified is either medium or high risk, or currently constitutes a gap in policy.

8.2 Medium risk policy to 2032

Medium risk policies are responsible for 47% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • The Clean Growth Strategy set out an intention to develop low-emissions fertiliser and tackle endemic diseases in cattle. This should be turned into firm policies.

8.3 High risk policy to 2032

High risk policies are responsible for 8% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Agricultural policies are required to reduce emissions through crop and soil management, livestock diet health and breeding, waste and manure management, and energy efficiency.
  • The main projected savings from the land use change sector involves afforestation which will require the replacement scheme for CAP linking the payment of public money to a range of public goods that tree planting can deliver, and the creation of Forestry Investment Zones to incentivise afforestation. England’s target for woodland cover implies an annual afforestation rate of 6,000 Ha/annum to 2060, whilst the CCC’s scenario to 2030 relies on 15,000 Ha/annum in the UK, increasing to 27,000 Ha/annum to unlock further savings. If these rates were allocated to Devon65 (there is minimal scope for afforestation in Plymouth and Torbay) this results in annual rates of 299 to 736 Ha/annum. Devon’s current woodland area is approximately 79,000 Ha (12% of land area). The current annual tree planting rate in the UK is 7,000 Ha/annum.
  • The UK Peatland Strategy66 targets two million hectares of peatland in good condition, under restoration or being sustainably managed by 2040. If this is apportioned to Devon purely on an area basis then this is approximately 55,000 Ha, or 8% of land area in Devon.

8.4 Policy gap risk policy to 2032

Policy gaps are responsible for 45% of projected carbon reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • A stronger policy framework should be developed that goes beyond the current industry-led voluntary approach as this is showing that emissions have remained static.
  • New policies should be covered to cover other measures e.g. for crops and soils, sheep health, livestock diets and breeding, waste and manure management and energy efficiency. This should be addressed in developing the post-CAP policy framework that better links support more closely with emissions reductions.
  • Developing a strategy to accelerate afforestation rates including ensuring the post-CAP policy framework better links support more closely with tree planting, and other land use measures such as peatland restoration.

8.5 Core scenario to 2050

The CCC has identified the following core options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • A variety of on-farm practices to reduce non-CO2 emissions from soils, livestock, waste and manure management and from reduced energy consumption in stationary machinery. In some cases, they represent low regret options required to meet an 80% target by 2050, where costs and barriers to implementation are relatively low (e.g. practices to improve efficient use of nitrogen).
  • Continuing the rate of afforestation from the 2030 more ambitious rate of 27,000 Ha/annum nationally (736 Ha/annum in Devon) and planting trees on 1% of additional agricultural land by 2030.

8.6 Further ambition to 2050

The CCC has identified the following further ambition options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • Replacing natural gas with electricity (some of which can be met with on-site renewables like wind or solar) and almost completely decarbonising on-farm machinery by switching away from diesel and biofuels by 2050 and replacing with hydrogen, electricity, bio-methane or robotics.
  • A higher level of deployment for low-carbon on-farm practices.
  • Moving to healthier diets away from beef, lamb and dairy (a 20% reduction by 2050, which results in an 8% reduction in cattle and sheep numbers in the UK and a 23% decrease in grassland area) and reducing avoidable food waste (20% reduction by 2025).
  • Speculative options in the agriculture sector have also been considered, and it is stated that some of these options would be required to achieve net-zero.
  • Further livestock breeding measures.
  • A more aggressive reduction in beef, lamb and dairy options of 50% by 2050.
  • A 50% reduction in food waste.
  • Replacing any remaining fossil fuels used in agricultural vehicles with synthetic fuels (expensive option).
  • Increasing the national tree planting rate to 30,000 Ha/annum (818 Ha/annum DPT) whilst improving the productivity of new stock by 10%.
  • Planting trees on 10% of farm land and extending hedges by 40%.
  • Planting energy crops (quantity unspecified).
  • Restoring 55% of peatland area.
  • Harvested biomass from trees (76% for fuel, the remainder for long-lived products e.g. construction).
  • The demands on land use implied by the Further Ambition option would rely on a 20% shift away from beef, lamb and dairy, a medium level of improvement in crop productivity and increase in livestock stocking density, a 20% reduction in food waste by 2025 and moving 10% of horticulture crop to indoor systems.
  • Speculative options in the land use sector have also been considered, and it is stated that some of these options would be required to achieve net-zero.
    • Reaching annual tree planting rates of 47,000 Ha/annum (1,282 Ha/annum in DPT).
    • Further restoration of peatlands (75% uplands and 50% lowlands) and seasonal management of the water table on 25% of lowland peat.
    • Switching some crop production on lowland peat to paludiculture or ‘wet-farming’ (e.g. crops that can be grown in water) would allow the water table to be raised permanently and for emissions to fall compared to conventional crop production.

8.7 Opportunities for accelerated delivery in DPT

Based on projected and proposed action that would be required to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the following would need to be adopted or considered in DPT if a target of 2030 is required:

  • Agricultural practices: The CCC scenarios assume a variety of on-farm practices to reduce non-CO2 emissions from soils, livestock, waste and manure management. It is argued that as a whole, these measures will actually be cost-saving for the sector. However, the scenarios are based on an estimate of the rate at which the industry as a whole would be able to develop and implement these measures, and so early adoption by DPT would imply that the local agriculture sector is capable and motivated to accelerate on the national timetable. The CCC also assume that this will in part be driven by the post-CAP funding mechanism which will reward farmers for socially positive land management practices. The development of this funding mechanism is outside of DPT’s control.
  • Farm machinery: The zero-carbon scenarios assume shifting from natural gas to electricity, and that all mobile machinery is replaced with electric, bio-methane, or hydrogen alternatives, alongside the increasing use of robotics. This is unlikely to be an area where DPT can accelerate on the national timetable alone. The agriculture sector can support the decarbonisation of the electricity grid, for example by increasing the uptake of farm-scale anaerobic digestion (or other renewable energy technologies such as wind or solar), some of which could be directly utilised to meet the energy demand on farms. In accounting terms, the saving would be attributed to the Power sector rather than the Agriculture sector.
  • Diets: The diets assumed in the scenarios are used to assess demand from the agriculture sector. As emissions are measured in terms of supply rather than demand (i.e. the emissions associated with food production in DPT as opposed to the emissions associated with the food eaten by DPT’s residents) increasing the uptake of low-impact diets in DPT will not in itself be sufficient to drive down emissions in DPT’s agriculture sector, as produce is traded beyond DPT’s border. Nonetheless, differing livestock practices result in different levels of environmental impact (for example meat produced on Dartmoor versus that produced in a feedlot). They may be opportunities to change methods of farming practices that could accompany shifts in diet (e.g. eating more expensive lower impact meat as the meat component in flexitarian diets).
  • Afforestation: Meeting the most aggressive of the afforestation CCC rates implies almost 3,600 Ha/annum in DPT in 2030. This is equivalent to half the current afforestation rate for the whole of England, and would constitute over 0.5% of total DPT’s land area per year at that rate.
  • Peat: DPT would need to meet the national timeline for peatland restoration three times faster which would require identifying additional funding. This is based on an initial first order estimate, and a more detailed review of peatland in DPT would be needed. An analysis of land use indicates that the area of peatland in DPT is low, which mean emissions due to peat are also would lower (as would potential savings from peat management).
  • Blue Carbon: Blue carbon is the carbon stored in coastal and marine ecosystems67. It is not currently included in the reporting of DPT’s GHG footprint, nor is it considered in the CCC reports. Nevertheless, the consideration of the potential to use coastal habitats through the management of marine ecosystems within DPT’s borders may offer some potential for GHG removal, and is an area that could be explored further.

92% of emissions from waste in the UK arise from methane the majority of which are emitted from the decomposition of biodegradable waste in landfill sites. As biodegradable waste is segregated in waste collection and landfill is ended emissions are forecast to decline. DPT local authorities responsible for Local Authority Collected Waste (LACW) (household and some commercial waste) stopped landfilling all but a very small fraction of LACW in Feb 2019 (although methane emissions from old landfill sites will continue for many years). LACW is now either recycled or used for energy recovery. However there is still a significant volume of commercial and industrial waste including biodegradable waste that is currently sent to landfill. The projected trajectory for GHG emissions from all waste in DPT is shown in Figure 22 (values for 2016, 2032 and 2050 are provided in Appendix A).

Figure 22: Projected GHG emissions in DPT’s Waste sector to 2050 as a result of national policy (interpretation of graph is described in caption to Figure 1)

The large variation in historic emissions stems from landfill sources in the NAEI base data.

The CCC’s least cost national pathway anticipates emissions falling by 56% between 2016 and 2030 through measures to reduce methane emission from landfill as shown in Figure 23.

Figure 23: CCCs indicators for the UK waste sector68

9.1 Low risk policy to 2032

The CCC has not identified any low risk policies. All GHG reduction identified is either medium or high risk, or currently constitutes a gap in policy.

9.2 Medium risk policy to 2032

Medium risk policies are responsible for 6% of projected GHG reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Waste prevention.
  • Elimination of biodegradable waste streams to landfill by 2030 in England.
  • Recycling rates in England rise to 65%.

9.3 High risk policy to 2032

High risk policies are responsible for 30% of projected GHG reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified the following proposals for England in the Clean Growth Strategy as high risk:

  • The ambition for the UK to be a zero avoidable waste economy by 2050.
  • The intention to work towards no food waste entering landfill by 2030.
  • The desire to explore innovative ways to manage emissions from landfill, including legacy sites.

9.4 Policy gap risk policy to 2032

Policy gaps are responsible for 65% of projected GHG reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Banning biodegradable waste to landfill no later than 2025.
  • Managing emissions from legacy landfill sites.

9.5 Core scenario to 2050

The CCC has identified the following core options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally:

  • Elimination of biodegradable waste streams to landfill in England by 2030.
  • Household/municipal recycling rates in England rise to 65%.

9.6 Further ambition to 2050

The CCC has identified the following further ambition options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • A 20% reduction in avoidable food waste by 2025.
  • Bio-degradable waste streams sent to landfill is eliminated by 2025 at the latest through a mandatory separate collection of bio-degradable waste by 2023.
  • Waste water treatment plant to achieve a reduction in methane and N2O emissions of least 20% by 2050 through incentive mechanisms for water companies.

Alternative approaches identified by the CCC include:

  • A 20% reduction in avoidable food waste by 2025 rising to 50% reduction by 2050.

9.7 Opportunities for accelerated delivery in DPT

Based on projected and proposed action required to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the following would need to be adopted or considered in DPT if a target of 2030 is required:

  • Check status of all legacy and recent landfill sites and assess opportunities for additional methane capture and energy production. Maps of historic landfill sites are available69.
  • Instigate separate food / biodegradable waste collection in all districts in DPT with waste directed to AD to include households and businesses generating food/biodegradable waste.
  • Ensure sufficient capacity for anaerobic digestion of DPT’s food waste.
  • Obtain reliable and up to date information on volume and composition of non-domestic waste streams to enable emissions assessment.
  • Work with businesses , communities and individuals to share good practice and provide support to encourage behavioural change
  • Reduced waste generation especially food waste with a 25% reduction from 2017 by 2025 to reduce waste collection and disposal emissions.
  • Increase DPT’s household/municipal recycling rates to 70% by 2025 (from 2017) to reduce disposal emissions from energy from waste (EfW) facilities.
  • Increase heat offtake from EfW plants to improve efficiency and reducing net emissions.
  • Improve recycling of the materials that have been identified as having a higher carbon footprint – metal, textiles and plastics
  • Identify processing gaps in wider South West region waste recycling and treatment facilities and make appropriate provision for particular materials where gaps are identified.
  • Liaise with South West Water to achieve a reduction in methane and N2O emissions of least 20% by 2030.

Fluorinated gasses (F-gases) account for a small percentage of UK GHG emissions (3% in 2017) and although released in small volumes they can have a global warming potential (GWP) up to 23,000 times greater than CO2. The four F-gases included in the UK emissions inventory are hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) 94%, sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆) 4%, perfluorocarbons (PFCs) 2% and nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃) less than 1%, of which HFCs were 94% in 2017. The largest source of emissions of HFCs is the refrigeration, air conditioning and heat pump sector (RACHP).

The projected trajectory for GHG emissions from F-gases is shown in Figure 24 (values for 2016, 2032 and 2050 are provided in Appendix A).

Figure 24: Projected GHG emissions in DPT’s F-gases sector to 2050 as a result of national policy (interpretation of graph is described in caption to Figure 1)

Emissions from F-gases have been estimated in DPT by apportioning national emissions on the basis if the proportional sizes of non-domestic electricity emissions (as refrigeration, air conditioning and heat pumps are responsible for a high proportion70 of these emissions). In addition, emissions from industrial and transport refrigeration are also significant. A bottom-up calculation of F-gas emissions in DPT would enable a better understanding of the particular issues associated with these emissions locally. The national strategy for reducing emissions from F-gases is summarised in Figure 25.

Figure 25: CCC indicators for the UK F-Gas sector71

10.1 Low risk policy to 2032

The CCC has not identified any low risk policies. All GHG reduction identified is medium risk.

10.2 Medium risk policy to 2032

Medium risk policies are responsible for all projected GHG reduction to 2032. The CCC has identified these as:

  • Continue the UK’s inclusion in the EU F-gas Regulation, or develop equivalent or stronger legislation in the UK.
  • Deliver a plan to restrict the use of F-gases to the very limited uses where there are currently no viable alternatives.

10.3 High risk policy to 2032

The CCC has not identified any high risk policies. All GHG reduction identified is medium risk.

10.4 Policy gap risk policy to 2032

The CCC has not identified any policy gaps. All GHG reduction identified is medium risk.

10.5 Core scenario to 2050

The CCC has identified the following core options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • A market cap on HFCs that is 79% below 2015 levels by 2030.
  • Bans on the use of F-gases in many new types of equipment where less harmful alternatives are widely available.
  • Mandatory ‘management measures’ including regular leak checks and repair, gas recovery at end-of-life, record keeping, training and certification of technicians and product labelling.

10.6 Further ambition to 2050

The CCC has identified the following further ambition options that would be required to continue the 80% GHG reduction trajectory nationally.

  • In 2016 it was estimated72 that UK F-Gas emissions from Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs) were 1.0 million tonnes CO2 equivalent, based on a usage of 54 million MDIs11. This was approximately 6% of total UK F-Gas emissions in 2016. Around 40 million MDIs were prescribed in the UK in 2006, rising by 35% to reach the level of 54 million in 2016. This increase is at a considerably higher rate than the growth in population, which rose by 8% during the same period. Current EU F-Gas Regulation12 exempts MDIs from the EU HFC phase-down, hence there are no direct regulatory pressures on this application of HFCs. Without any change to the current prescribing practices usage and emissions will continue to rise slowly. The UK population is forecast to have risen a further 8% by 2030. A conservative estimate is a further 10% rise of MDI use by 2030, leading to a projected emission of 1.1 MT CO2e. It is forecast that MDIs will represent over 25% of UK F-Gas emissions during the 5th carbon budget period. The Further Ambition scenario sees a transition from MDIs to dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) and low-GWP alternatives before 2027, which would reduce emissions by around 90%. In this scenario it is assumed that salbutamol MDIs are replaced with low-GWP alternatives due to their lower costs compared to DPIs.
  • Additional regulations to deliver further reductions in the refrigeration, air-conditioning and heat pumps (RACHP) sector, including:
  • Reduced use of R-410A (GWP of 2,088) in medium sized air-conditioning, replaced with variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems using lower-GWP HFC-32 (GWP 675).
  • Wider use of propane split air-conditioning.
  • Reduced use of Hydrofluoroolefin/HFC blends in small commercial, industrial and marine refrigeration.
  • Retrofitting of existing equipment that uses HFCs (R-134a systems and small R-404A systems).
  • Leak reductions through improved design, maintenance and end-of-life recovery.

10.7 Opportunities for accelerated delivery in DPT

Based on projected and proposed action that would be required to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the following would need to be adopted or considered in DPT if a target of 2030 is required:

  • Local measure to stop the use of F-gases in RACHP and other equipment
  • Local enforcement of ‘management measures’ including regular leak checks and repair, gas recovery at end-of-life, record keeping, training and certification of technicians and product labelling

GHG removal is not part of the CCC’s annual Report to Parliament as the 80% emissions reduction required by the Climate Change Act does not necessitate GHG removal. There are therefore no current policies that apply directly to GHG removal and no current policy gaps per se.

Achieving net zero emission in the UK will require some level of GHG removal to mitigate residual emissions in difficult sectors such as agriculture and air transport. Given DPT’s largley rural character there is significant potential for DPT to mitigate its GHG emissions in the agriculture and land use sectors. Nationally the main projected savings from these sectors involves afforestation. This will require any replacement scheme for the Common Agricultural Policy to include payment of public money for the range of public goods that tree planting can deliver, and the creation of Forestry Investment Zones to incentivise afforestation. England’s target for woodland cover implies an annual afforestation rate of 6,000 Ha/annum to 2060, whilst the CCC’s scenario to 2030 in the Report to Parliament relies on 15,000 Ha/annum in the UK, increasing in the Net Zero core scenario to 27,000 Ha/annum to unlock further savings. The current annual tree planting rate in the UK is 7,000 Ha/annum. While tree planting is helpful it requires a large land take to become significant for example, the area of Devon is 662,000ha which, if all forested, would sequester approximately 3,400 ktCO2e/annum73, some 41% of the DPT’s 2016 emissions.

Peatland also has a role to play. The UK Peatland Strategy74 targets two million hectares of peatland in good condition, under restoration or being sustainably managed by 2040.

For GHG removal involving use of timber and biomass the CCC emphasise that for removal to occur it will be critical to assure the sustainability of timber and biomass fuel and stress that this will require strong comprehensive standards. There is scope, the CCC asserts, that the domestic supply of timber and biomass fuel can promote biodiversity and resilience to climate change in UK landscapes without conflicting with food production.

11.1 Core scenario to 2050

The Core Scenario includes:

  • Continuing the rate of afforestation from the 2030 more ambitious rate of 27,000 Ha/annum nationally and planting trees on 1% of additional agricultural land by 2030.
  • Using biomass with CCS (BECCS) for energy production removing 20 MtCO2e by 2050.
  • Timber frame house and engineered wood system penetration remains at today’s levels (15-28%).

11.2 Further ambition to 2050

The Further Ambition scenario includes:

  • Increasing the national tree planting rate to 30,000 Ha/annum Planting trees on 10% of farm land, extending hedges by 40% and restoring 55% of peatland area.
  • Expanding BECCS in various applications to remove 51 MtCO2e using 173 TWh of resource.
  • In 2050 timber framed new build houses rise to over 40%. Engineering wood systems reach 5% by 2050.
  • Demonstrating direct air capture with carbon dioxide storage (DACCS). DACCS separates CO2 from the air using chemical reagents. The separated carbon dioxide is then stored in geological formations (for example in depleted oil and gas fields).  DACCS has large energy requirements and needs access to CCS infrastructure.

Speculative Options include:

  • In the land use sector:
    • Reaching annual tree planting rates of 47,000 Ha/annum.
    • Further restoration of peatlands (75% uplands and 50% lowlands) and seasonal management of the water table on 25% of lowland peat.
    • Switching some crop production on lowland peat to paludiculture or ‘wet-farming’ (e.g. crops that can be grown in water) would allow the water table to be raised permanently and for emissions to fall compared to conventional crop production.
  • Timber frame houses rising to 80% of new homes in 2050.
  • Technologies such as biochar and enhanced weathering:
  • Biochar is formed by heating organic matter in low oxygen conditions, as in pyrolysis and gasification technologies. Biochar can be added to soils as a stable long term store of carbon which can also improve soil fertility.
  • Enhanced weathering is achieved by spreading ground up silicate rock over the land surface which naturally fixes carbon from the air. Crushing rock is energy intensive and there would be significant environmental concerns to be overcome before deploying this practise on any scale.
  • DACCS deployment

11.7 Opportunities for accelerated delivery in DPT

Figure 2 and Appendix 2 illustrate that only the most ambitious national GHG removal scenario will be sufficient to mitigate DPT’s residual emissions.

Options for achieving GHG removal in DPT include:

  • Localised CCS technologies which may evolve. Various technologies are currently being developed and trialled. Examples include:
  • Accelerated carbonation technology for the treatment of thermal residue75
  • Solvent based carbon dioxide extraction from flue gasses76
  • Carbon dioxide injection into fertiliser production77

Techniques like these could potentially be applied to flue gases emitted from combustion plant in DPT e.g. the Devonport and Marsh Barton EfW plant.

  • Increased use of timber in construction. As timber framed homes are currently a viable technology there would appear to be few barriers to pursuing this aside from the supply of sustainable timber required.  

Tree planting and peatland restoration

12.1 Costs to achieve net-zero by 2050

As part of its analysis for the UK to achieve Net Zero by 2050, the CCC undertook a high level assessment of the costs and benefits of meeting the target. At a national scale, it was found that action was preferable to inaction, and that achieving Net Zero by 2050 would cost 1 to 2% of GDP in 2050, a similar to the cost to that estimated in earlier studies to achieve an 80% reduction by 2050. The CCC also found that there may be additional co-benefits (for example improved air quality or reduced thermal discomfort in buildings), as well as economic opportunities for the UK to exploit a growing global market. These additional benefits were not quantified.

The approach taken was to establish net carbon abatement costs in each sector and combine these with the projected sectorial carbon reduction to estimate the net cost of meeting the targets. These net costs are expressed as an annual cost in 2050 both in absolute terms and as a proportion of annual GDP in 2050. The CCC analysis does not present annual (net) cost profiles, only saying that any such profile would vary across sectors with costs likely to be lower in earlier years of the transition. The only quantitative indication of the cost trajectory is an estimate of 2030 annual cost of under 1% of GDP which compares to the 2050 the cost of Net Zero estimated at 1.3% of GDP. As the economy is projected to grow by 46% between 2030 and 2050, the implied annual cost in 2030 is approximately £27 billion, compared to £51 billion in 2050 (i.e. an almost doubling in spend is forecast over the period).

The CCC has calculated abatement costs in terms of resource costs. These have been established by adding up costs and cost savings from carbon abatement measures, and comparing them to costs in an alternative scenario (generally of a hypothetical world with no climate action or climate damages). The example given is that for a loft insulation project, the net cost would comprise the annualised cost of the installation and the annual cost savings. Therefore, if the measure pays back within its lifetime it would have a negative cost (a saving). Other co-benefits e.g. reduced cold related illness and downstream impacts on the health service, are not included in the assessment. This approach does not fully capture the structural shifts required when transitioning from one mode of operation to another, with the example given being switching from gas-fired power stations (whose costs are dominated by annual running costs) to wind power (whose costs are dominated by upfront costs which would require up-front financing). The CCC admits that its approach to costs is simplified and that economic models should be used to assess the impact of decarbonisation on GDP.

While this approach to calculating costs and benefits results in the establishment of high level overall costs (or benefits) for each sector, it masks the underlying costs and benefits, which in many cases do not fall to the same party. For example, insulating dwellings would result in savings to those occupiers who live in the homes which benefit from the insulation, but if publicly funded the cost would be spread across society as a whole e.g. via general taxation or through higher energy bills. The approach taken to estimate the net cost to DPT has been to use the nationally calculated net costs and scale them to DPT based on the relative magnitude of emissions from each sector. For example, emissions from the Power sector in DPT are 1.7% of those nationally, so that factor was applied to the net cost of achieving Net Zero nationally (£4 billion under the Further Ambition scenario) to estimate the local net cost (£67million). The underlying assumption is that the costs and benefits assumed in the national calculations apply at a local level. In the example of the Power sector, whilst almost all of

the decarbonisation occurs outside DPT (e.g. offshore wind farms), it is assumed that the financing of those projects (and resultant benefits) are proportionate to power use in DPT relative to the country as a whole. This is a simplified approach intended to provide a first order estimate of the economic impact on DPT.

The apportioned 2050 costs for DPT meeting net zero are shown in Table 6. Achieving the Further Ambition scenario would hypothetically result in a net cost of £650 million with a further £245 million to achieve Net Zero using GHG removal technologies; a total of £895 million. This equates to 1.5% of DPT’s GDP in 2050, or approximately £661 per head of population in that year. The proportion of GDP calculated for DPT is higher than the 1% national average which partly reflects the different composition of the carbon footprint, and the lower GDP of DPT compared to the UK average. Net costs vary between sectors both in magnitude and direction (some are net costs and some a net benefit).The cost of the Further Ambition scenario is always more expensive than the Core scenario as the magnitude of carbon reduction is greater, and the measures required for the further quantum of carbon reduction are harder and therefore more costly to achieve.

The following underlying cost factors have been identified by the CCC for each of the sectors, and separated into those sectors where net cost is expected to be marginal or negative, and those that it is projected to be expensive.

Sectors with low or negative abatement costs:

  • Power: Net costs are low as although significant capital investment will be required for reinforcement of the transmission grid and, for the deepest emissions reduction, expensive CCS and hydrogen infrastructure will be required, these are almost offset by fuel cost savings from renewable energy (compared to conventional fossil fuel power generation). The cost of decarbonising electricity is borne via levies in the energy bills of householders and businesses. The CCC indicate that decarbonisation will add between £85 – £120 per year to energy bills between 2016 and 2030. Householders could offset this by £150 through efficiency savings from replacing lighting, appliances and boilers at replacement periods. While demand reduction is a separate issue from decarbonising supply (i.e. bills would be even lower without the decarbonisation) the argument is that maintaining energy bills at current levels would be broadly tolerable. Projecting to 2050 the CCC’s view is that on balance switching to electric heating and vehicles whilst decarbonising the electricity supply by developing more renewable energy capacity will be broadly cost neutral. However, how these costs are allocated at an individual level may mean that not everyone would experience cost neutrality going forward.
  • Transport: Electric cars are expected to be cheaper to purchase than conventional cars by 2030, and in addition will be cheaper to run. Low-carbon HGVs could also offset their higher purchase costs through lower running costs. Buses are the only identified mode of transport within the sector with high net costs.
  • Agriculture and Land Use: On balance, many of the proposed abatement measures result in enhanced productivity thereby resulting in a net-cost saving.
  • Waste: The assumptions assume a reasonable cost in banning waste from landfill, though this is almost offset by the assumed benefit associated with reduced household waste.
  • F-gases: It is assumed that the proposed measures have a small cost benefit.

Sectors with high abatement costs:

  • Buildings: The costs associated in switching to heat pumps and additional insulation which in many cases will be on harder to treat properties are high even once savings are taken into account. Current national spend on rolling-out low carbon heating is £100 million, whereas the Net Zero scenario implies a national spend annual of £15 billion with deployment beginning before 2030. If apportioned to DPT this is approximately £270 million per annum (0.7% of DPT’s GDP in 2030).
  • Industry: Measures in industry are mainly focussed around heavy industrial processes and consist of switching to low-carbon fuels and CCS, both of which are expensive. There may be some savings associated with improved efficiency, though these are not identified in any detail. The competitiveness of UK industry would need to be considered in the context of these costs. If they are levied directly on industry then those industries may lose trade to competitors which do not meet the same level of carbon performance i.e. “carbon leakage” would occur. Handling emissions from this sector may therefore require emissions trading schemes.
  • GHG Removal: Both BECCS and DACCS are expected to be expensive solutions. The cost of DACCS is almost trebled if imported biomass is used as opposed to domestically produced bioenergy. It has been assumed that the cost of this would be largely borne by industries that have not reduced their own emissions to zero, for example Aviation.
Cost of Core (77% reduction)Cost of Further Ambition (96% reduction)Additional cost to Net Zero
SectorNet cost (£million)Net cost as % GDPNet Cost £/capitaNet cost (£million)Net cost as % GDPNet Cost £/capitaNet cost (£million)Net cost as % GDPNet Cost £/capita
Power-40.1-0.1%-£3067.10.1%£500.00.0%£0
Buildings229.60.4%£170320.60.5%£2370.00.0%£0
Industry0.10.0%£03.20.0%£20.00.0%£0
Transport36.50.1%£274.50.0%£30.00.0%£0
Agriculture & Land Use Change23.80.0%£1896.40.2%£710.00.0%£0
Waste and F-gases0.00.0%£03.20.0%£20.00.0%£0
GHG Removal47.10.1%£35155.20.3%£115244.60.4%£181
Total297.00.5%£219650.21.1%£480244.60.4%£181
Table 6: Apportioned net costs for DPT in the year of 2050 (i.e. the aggregate cost will be much higher as there will need to be spending in every year to 2050) by sector expressed in absolute terms, as a proportion of GDP and per head of population in that year.

12.2 Costs to achieve net-zero by 2030

The work of the CCC is predicated around decarbonising the UK’s economy by 2050. The proposed delivery programme is based on the current technology available, and forecasts of advances both in technology, and the cost of that technology. It has been shown in the previous sections that while there may be some areas identified in the CCC reports that DPT could choose to accelerate delivery to reach the proposed 2050 levels by 2030, there are likely to be other areas where DPT does not have that ability. This could be for a variety of reasons for example political (e.g. low carbon power generation is a national infrastructure programme and short of becoming an “energy island” DPT does not have control over the carbon intensity of the electricity grid) or technological (e.g. the mass roll-out of electric vehicles will depend on the global development of cost-competitive cars with ranges that meet the needs of most users which is outside of DPT’s direct control, or the proposed technologies for GHG removal have not yet been commercially deployed).

The CCC scenarios assume that the country as a whole moves towards Net Zero in a coordinated way and that due to the wide take-up of measures across sectors, the associated technological fixes become cheaper over time. For example, between 2025 and 2050 nuclear energy is forecast to fall in price by 28%, air source heat pumps by 11%, batteries for electric vehicles by 32%, and fuel cells for HGVs by 40%. Even if it were technically feasible for DPT to accelerate the CCC programme from 2050 to 2030, the associated (net) costs reported by the CCC would be significantly higher for DPT.

In the absence of any other data, for indicative purposes the CCC cost data for decarbonisation to 2050 was apportioned to DPT as if the rate of delivery was significantly accelerated to meet the target by 2030. The inherent assumptions in this approach are:

  • All the measures identified to meet Net Zero in 2050 are available for deployment in the run up to 2030. In practice this is not the case.
  • The costs of deploying those solutions would be the same in trying to hit a 2030 target. This would not be the case, costs would be higher as DPT would not benefit from the learning associated with economies of scale that a coordinated national programme would deliver.
  • There is the capacity both nationally and in DPT to develop and deploy the required decarbonisation measures.
  • The cost profile is the same shape as for a programme that extends to 2050 (i.e. spend is higher towards the end of the period).
  • As with Section 12.1 it is assumed that the cost (and benefit) of measures that would need to occur nationally fall proportionately in DPT.

The CCC’s approach was taken to establish the net cost in 2030 that is to report the costs as an annual cost in the target year of decarbonisation. To achieve this, the programme was compressed into a much shorter period i.e. rather than from 2019 to 2050 (31 years), the programme would run from 2019 to 2030 (11 years), and so the rate was increased by a factor of 2.8. This factor was applied to the net costs from the 2050 DPT scenario and compared relative to the projected populations and GDP of DPT in 2030 (both of which were lower than the 2050 equivalents). The results are shown in Table 7.

Compared to meeting the target in 2050, the annual net cost increased from £895 million to £2,522 million and from 1.5% GDP in the target year to 6.7% GDP, equivalent to £1,992 per person. These costs are likely to be significantly understated, and in practice not all of the projected emissions reduction would be technically feasible in this timeframe. In addition, the up-front capital costs involved would be significantly higher as the CCC’s net costs are inclusive of benefits. As these benefits do not necessarily align with the parties responsible for bearing the cost, the actual cost excluding any benefits (which could not be inferred from the CCC reports) is arguably more representative of the scale of the financing challenge that DPT could face accelerating beyond the national trajectory.

Cost of Core (77% reduction)Cost of Further Ambition (96% reduction)Additional cost to Net Zero
SectorNet cost (£million)Net cost as % GDPNet Cost £/capitaNet cost (£million)Net cost as % GDPNet Cost £/capitaNet cost (£million)Net cost as % GDPNet Cost £/capita
Power-113.0-0.3%-£89189.00.5%£1490.00.0%£0
Buildings647.01.7%£511903.62.4%£7140.00.0%£0
Industry0.40.0%£08.90.0%£70.00.0%£0
Transport102.90.3%£8112.50.0%£100.00.0%£0
Agriculture & Land Use Change67.00.2%£53271.70.7%£2150.00.0%£0
Waste and F-gases0.00.0%£09.00.0%£70.00.0%£0
GHG Removal132.70.4%£105437.51.2%£346689.41.8%£545
Total837.02.2%£6611832.34.8%£1,447689.41.8%£545
Table 7: Apportioned net costs for DPT in 2030 by sector expressed in absolute terms, as a proportion of GDP and per head of population in that year.

13.1 General

The estimates of projected GHG emissions across DPT have demonstrated the scale of action that would need to occur in order to reach net-zero emissions. The projections were, in the first instance, based upon a suggested national timeline of decarbonisation by 2050. This highlighted that there is still much uncertainty regarding measures and policies in place to achieve interim targets in 2032 based upon a trajectory of an 80% national reduction in emission by 2050, and that significant additional measures (the Further Ambition scenario) and GHG removal technology will be required to get to net-zero. GHG emissions projected to 2032 and 2050 that would arise assuming all measures assessed in the analysis were taken up are shown in Figure 26 and (on a proportional basis) Figure 27. It can be seen that currently emissions are approximately 8.3 MtCO2e from a range of sectors, though by 2050 almost every sector has been decarbonised with total residual emissions of around 1.9 MtCO2e which would need to be offset by GHG removal technologies. The persistence of agricultural and land use emissions is perhaps the most noteworthy feature. The sector represents 57% of projected emissions in 2050 and reflects DPT’s geographically rural character. However, within DPT Plymouth, Torbay and Exeter will have a very different make up of emissions and such urban areas will therefore have different sectorial weightings in their priorities for GHG reduction (reducing emissions from buildings for example).

Figure 26: Current and projected residual emissions (tCO2e) in DPT by sector in 2032 and 2050 based on the national timetable
Figure 27: Current and projected residual emissions as a proportion of the total (excluding GHG removals) in DPT by sector in 2032 and 2050 based on the national timetable

Achieving the same amount of carbon reduction by 2030 would in effect require compressing the same measures into a timeframe that is only about a third as long. For some of the proposed measures where the technology is sufficiently mature (e.g. insulating all lofts and cavity walls) this might be possible, though it would require the funding mechanisms to do so, and there would also need to be local capacity for delivery. In addition, existing barriers that have already prevented such action from occurring would need to be overcome (e.g. in the case of these insulation measures, the lack of engagement from some property owners). In other cases, faster deployment may be possible but would face increased cost and other barriers. For example, electric vehicles are currently available but they are significantly more expensive than their conventional counterparts, and suffer from reduced ranges and lack of widespread charging infrastructure. In other cases, the technology may not yet be sufficiently developed to implement now e.g. some of the proposed GHG removal technologies. These issues are significant when considered at a national level, but would be exacerbated if DPT were to pursue this timeline independently of the planned rate of change nationally. This would mean that many of these measures would need to be deployed without the support of national policy (e.g. regulation or financial rewards) and in many cases would rely on utilising technology that may not be sufficiently developed (or that is very expensive) to achieve the requisite amount of GHG emission reduction. These issues in general relate to the deployment of technological solutions (e.g. electricity generation, insulation, electric vehicles, GHG removal etc.), and so if any of these identified solutions do not prove to be possible at the scale required, then additional measures would be required. These may be from other sectors (i.e. “over delivery” in one sector to offset shortfalls in another), or could require voluntary actions by citizens and businesses in DPT to reduce demand. Examples of this could

include reducing travel, accepting lower temperatures in buildings, decarbonising industry etc. Clearly, these have a significant political dimension, would not be possible in many areas and would be fiercely opposed by many due to loss of GVA, jobs, comfort, amenity etc. In some cases (e.g. deindustrialisation), there is also the risk of “carbon leakage” i.e. those processes simply moving to another geographical place and creating emissions there.

The analysis has not been able to separate technological from behavioural measures due to the way the CCC has aggregated emissions reduction. It is also important to note that in many cases, behavioural and technological changes need to occur together (e.g. people need to both switch and adapt to electric vehicles), and that even it is not always possible to assign savings to one of the two when they act together. For example, if travel distances by private car are reduced by 10%, and 30% of cars switch to electric versions, then the cumulative impact can be calculated, but the relative reduction from each will depend on which has been presumed to occur first (i.e. emissions from the behaviour action will be greater if it is assumed to have occurred before the switch to electric vehicles has occurred).

The analysis has been based on emissions in DPT on a “production” rather than a “consumption” basis. It has been shown that at a national level the latter results in emissions that are over 1.6 times higher. Care needs to be taken to understand and communicate what net-zero emissions means in the context of DPT. In the case of emissions on a “production” basis this refers to all emissions arising due to activity within DPT. For example, any energy consumed in buildings or industry, any transport in the territory, etc. In the case of emissions on a “consumption” basis this would include emission from imports and exclude emissions from exports of goods and services. As DPT is a net importer of goods and services, emissions would be higher on this basis. Both accounting measures have advantages, and arguably measuring on a consumption basis is a better reflection of DPT’s impact, though it is harder to measure and potentially less easy to influence (e.g. if goods are being produced globally). Accounting for emissions on a production basis (as is undertaken at a national level in terms of reporting progress against the Climate Change Act) means that emissions from sectors like Power and Agriculture are heavily influenced by action outside the territory. In the case of power, the carbon intensity of any electricity consumed in DPT is reliant on the mix of generating technologies that occurs across the national electricity grid. Whilst DPT can set additional targets (e.g. DPT should be 100% fed from renewable electricity) installing more renewable generation capacity in the territory would not in itself reduce emissions materially locally.

The analysis has clearly shown that significant action is needed across every sector in DPT to achieve the deep emission reduction that would be required by 2030. Should it not be possible to achieve carbon reduction in any particular sector then this would require additional reduction to be achieved in other sectors. Whilst there are significant challenges in meeting this level of reduction, particularly within an accelerated timescale, there may also be some opportunities specific to DPT. Some of the key drivers and messages from the sectors considered are discussed below.

13.2 Power

The power sector is the sector that has seen the greatest emissions reduction over the past decade. This has been driven almost entirely by the reduced carbon intensity of the national grid, due to a significant switch away from coal fired powered stations, and increased amounts of renewably generated electricity. Whilst DPT continues to be connected to national electricity infrastructure (and it is not proposed that DPT should become an “energy island”), decarbonisation of the sector will be reliant on further uptake of renewable power generation, principally from large offshore wind, CCS and nuclear energy at a national scale.

13.3 Buildings

Buildings is a significant sector representing 23% of DPT’s emissions. Decarbonising the Buildings sector in DPT will require minimising emissions from new buildings, as well as practically insulating all existing buildings and switching their heating systems to low‑carbon alternatives. Regarding new buildings DPT faces similar challenges to elsewhere in the UK, namely that standards for new development broadly sit within the requirements of national planning policy and building regulations. Currently local authorities are not able to require new dwellings to achieve standards in advance of approximately Code 4 of the now defunct Code for Sustainable Homes. It has recently been shown that the cost of requiring “zero carbon” for new developments is relatively small compared to the average profit per dwelling achievable by volume house builders. DPT could look to test this by requiring all new development to meet a “zero carbon” standard. It is especially important that this is enacted as soon as possible, given the lag between the granting of planning permission and the building out of pipeline developments that persists in the construction sector.

Existing buildings will need to be insulated. This will involve identifying and insulating all uninsulated cavity walls and lofts (including further top-ups to lofts), and insulating most solid wall properties. This is likely to be an expensive task; the cost of external solid wall insulation alone costs78 £6,500 to £13,000 per dwelling whilst addressing a property in a more holistic way e.g. using the Dutch Energisprong method currently costs £65,000 per property with a target of £40,000 through prefabrication, smart technology and economies of scale79. This is in-line with provisional cost estimates emerging from Devon’s ZEBCat project80 of £35,000 to £70,000 per property. To address approximately 100,000 solid wall dwellings in DPT at £40,000 a property would cost £4 billon (14% of DPT’s current GVA). Although the intention would be for installations to be funded by repayments to be made on an energy plan over a long period (payback periods of 30 years proposed), this still represents a significant investment. Time will tell if the lessons from ZEBCat81 can rolled out across DPT. As well as financing insulation programmes, there will also need to be sufficient local skills and capacity to install the measures.

These levels of efficiency improvements will be required in order to reduce both energy demand and peak heat loss, the latter being important for heat pumps. The efficiency of heat pumps is severely compromised if they have to operate at higher temperatures to overcome high heat loss, which would in turn increase the amount of electricity required. This would both increase energy bills (and worsen payback periods), and require an increased amount of low carbon electricity upstream. Alternative pathways to decarbonising heating systems include heat networks or an increased use of hydrogen to replace gas fired heating systems, though the development of hydrogen systems will need to be coordinated at a national scale. Whilst the arguments put forward have been predominantly in the context of residential buildings, it is also presumed that emissions from non-domestic buildings are also all but eliminated, predominantlythrough efficiency measures where possible, and switching to similar low-carbon heat sources as for dwellings.

In addition, further carbon reduction is projected to be achieved due to the improving efficiencies of lighting and equipment that is used within buildings, though this development is part of global technological development and not an area DPT can realistically accelerate. If decarbonisation from buildings cannot be achieved entirely using efficiency and low carbon heating systems, then the only other available option available would be to reduce demand for energy, with heat being the most significant end use. Examples of this include accepting lower internal temperatures, washing less etc. and are likely to be unpopular and difficult to implement at scale.

13.4 Industry

Direct industrial emissions arise predominantly from industrial activity in the production sector of DPT’s economy (although emission associated with this sector are higher as emissions from electricity are aggregated with other non-domestic buildings in the Buildings sector as this is how the data is reported by BEIS). Opportunities for emission reduction are identified as CCS for large industrial emitters as well as electrification and bioenergy for heat, and general unspecified energy efficiency improvements elsewhere. It is especially important for this sector that the cost of any carbon abatement over business-as-usual can be funded, otherwise this would place DPT’s businesses at a competitive disadvantage which would both harm DPT’s economy, and ultimately would result in business moving elsewhere and continuing with producing goods without reducing emissions (i.e. carbon leakage). Once any low regret/“low hanging fruit” measures have been implemented, this would require the identification of funding (e.g. from local, central or European budgets) to fun decarbonisation measures.

A Climate Emergency gives the Council a mandate to convey the concern of citizens to DPT’s industry. This will require getting closer to and deepening the understanding of industry across the DPT. An opportunity for DPT to proactively target emission reduction from this sector could involve funding a specialist unit which would develop relationships with the larger emitters and run a programme to reach smaller industrial emitters based on a detailed understanding of DPT’s industry. Prioritising sectors by energy intensity is recommended.

13.5 Transport

Transport is the largest source of emissions in DPT (28%) and under the net-zero scenario is still projected to be responsible for 24% of the residual emissions. This assumes that emissions from transport are reduced by around 80%. The main driver of this change is the shifting from conventional to electric vehicles (which also assumes a decarbonised electricity supply). This transition will require that conventional vehicles are no longer sold. Given that the average lifespan of cars is 14 years, with a 2030 target, this would require that halting the sale of conventional vehicles commences now (unless it were possible to scrap these cars by 2030, though this would be a waste of the embedded emissions). Nationally, the target for banning such cars is 2040. Even if this could be achieved now in DPT (the local authorities do not have this power and so it would require behaviour change), the higher cost (which is expected to become neutral by 2030) and poor range are significant barriers. The area where local action could be proactively taken is in the provision of charging infrastructure where an annual spend of at least £15.2 million per annum between now and 2030 would be required.

The scenario assumes a 10% modal shift (by distance travelled) from private car use by 2030. This would require extensive investment in public transport including zero carbon buses which at present not cost-competitive. Freight emissions from HGVs are a significant source of emissions (around 15% of transport emissions nationally) and aside from switching to hydrogen vehicles (not currently cost competitive) and/or bio-methane, DPT could proactively seek to work with bodies such as the Freight Transport Association and the Road Haulage Association, as well as local hauliers directly, to make improvements to logistics. This may also result in co-benefits with regard to congestion and local air quality.

Failure to deliver these actions would necessitate either deeper emission reductions in other sectors, or reductions within the sector through reducing the demand for travel. As it is not possible to obligate reductions in travel, this would need to be a voluntary course of action delivered at scale by DPT’s citizens and businesses. Doing so, if it were possible, would have significant economic and social impacts.

13.6 Agriculture and land use change

Agriculture is a significant emitter (22%), reduced somewhat when combined with land use change (19.0%). By 2050 the combined sector is far more important as because as other sectors decarbonise agriculture and land use change become responsible for 57% of residual emissions. This highlights the specific challenges associated with carbon abatement within the sector as the majority of emissions from this sector arise from farming of ruminant livestock.

Importantly a significant proportion of agricultural emissions from livestock farming occur in the form of methane which is a short lived greenhouse gas.  As such in respect to DPT achieving carbon neutrality, methane emissions from agriculture do not need to be rapidly brought to net-zero, but rather stabilised and then slowly decreased to prevent continually increasing global average temperature.

Some emission reduction would be possible through improved farming and land management practices. These need to be explored in greater detail, but there is a wealth of experience in DPT’s farming community. Otherwise, changes to diets resulting in reduced farming of livestock could also significantly reduce emissions from agriculture in DPT. These changes in diet would need to occur more widely than in DPT, given that meat and dairy produce is exported beyond DPT’s borders. Though if the amount of meat and dairy consumed by DPT’s citizens did considerably decrease then this would likely reduce the amount of livestock farmed in DPT to some extent, though it has not been possible to quantify this here. Significantly changing diets in this way would have economic impacts on the sector and impact on amenity for citizens, and it may not be possible for this sort of social change to be significantly accelerated on locally compared to the underlying national change. Although not accounted for within this sector specifically, the use of agricultural land to generate low carbon electricity (e.g. wind, PV or on-farm anaerobic digestion) represents a further opportunity where DPT can proactively seek to reduce emissions.

Regarding land use change, currently the land mix results in a net sink (under 4% of the total footprint). To meet the decarbonisation scenarios within DPT’s boundaries would require planting forest on 0.5% of total DPT land area every year to 2030 (i.e. 3,600 Ha/annum in DPT in 2030). There may also be specific local opportunities regarding management of peatland, and using coastal and marine ecosystems to sequester carbon, though this would require further analysis.

13.7 Waste

Even with the measures anticipated by 2050 the waste sector is projected to be responsible for 9% of DPT’s emissions (currently 7%).

Waste generation (especially food) should be reduced by 25% by 2025. This will require a strong element of behaviour change which could be supported by local campaigns. Further reductions should be targeted in an effort to reduce 2050 emissions projections.

DPT’s recycling rates should be increased to the 65% national target needed to reduce emissions from waste collection and treatment. Increasing plastic recycling will reduce fossil content in black bag (residual) waste (e.g. plastics) and consequently reduce fossil emissions EfW facilities, Increasing heat offtake from EfW plants improves their efficiency also reducing net emissions.

A DPT wide collection regime that separates food waste should be established and the food waste collected should be processed using anaerobic digestion with the methane produced optimally utilised.

In addition, it should be ensured that all legacy and recent landfill sites are capped, and that the methane is utilised.

13.8 F-gases

Emissions from F-gases (currently 5%) are a relatively small part of DPT’s footprint. However, under the net-zero scenario, the decarbonisation of other sectors means that the F-gas contribution continues to play a role (3% by 2050). The sector is driven by national and international legislation that outlaws refrigerants of various types and mandates inspection regimes and testing. There is therefore relatively limited scope for DPT to accelerate emission reduction from F-gases. It is noted however that air conditioning inspections (which are required for any system with a rated output of over 12 kW) are enforced by the local trading standards bodies. More proactive enforcement of these air conditioning inspections may be a route to lower emissions.

13.9 GHG removal

The projected pathway for decarbonisation results in residual emissions in DPT of approximately 1,910 MtCO2e. These emissions would need to be offset with GHG removal measures to achieve net-zero emissions. The CCC scenarios investigated are dominated by biomass CCS and in the case of the Royal Society scenario, direct air CCS. These are likely to be approaches that are taken up at a national level, and that being the case it would be reasonable for DPT to claim a proportionate share of those savings. The nature of DPT’s emissions, especially the dominance of agricultural emissions in 2050 leads to only the most extreme Royal Society scenario achieving net zero.

If DPT were to pursue a 2030 deadline, then it would need to develop GHG removal measures within the territory. Extensive tree planting and technology based solutions are likely to be required. There are some emerging localised CCS techniques that are being developed and these could potentially be applied to flue gases emitted from combustion plant in DPT e.g. the Devonport and Marsh Barton  EfW plants.

13.10 Next steps

The costs presented in the analysis are based on the values ascribed nationally by the CCC. These costs are net of any financial benefits (though do not consider further co-benefits e.g. improvements to air quality). These costs and benefits are also stated to not fall equally across society. For example, a domestic insulation programme that is funded for through energy bills (or subsidised by a local authority) would result in the cost being borne by society whilst the financial benefits would accrue only to those dwellings that receive insulation. For these reasons, it has not been possible here to obtain a gross cost of carbon reduction within each sector or for each measure. The analysis undertaken is “top down”, in that it allocates carbon reduction and costs from a national to a local level. This presumes a number of issues that may not be specifically true in the case of DPT, but the approach is nonetheless useful in providing an initial indication of the extent of the action required to achieve net-zero, given the source information available.

In order to estimate the gross cost of each measure then a “bottom up” measure-by-measure analysis would be needed. This would need to establish specific costs for all aspects of each measure. In the case of some measures these may not be available e.g. if the measure is not yet commercially developed and DPT is seeking to deploy earlier than nationally. Whilst measurement of costs on a gross basis would be more useful in terms of practically gathering budgets carbon reduction programmes, the presentation of the findings in net terms better demonstrates the strategic value within DPT of decarbonisation.

The next step should be to undertake further “bottom up” work to establish more specifically the amount of GHG emissions reduction that could be achieved. This analysis should include envisaged costs and savings and should be based on locally available resource assessments across each sector. It may be worthwhile separating this piece of work into an analysis of each sector.

These analyses should look to engage more widely with stakeholders in DPT to utilise the locally available expertise. DPT has made great progress in this having already established the Devon Climate Emergency Response Group and appointing a Net-Zero Task Force to develop a Devon Carbon Plan. The process will also involve a citizen’s assembly which will deliberate on the plan.

Budgets have been made available to support further evidence base analysis and wider public engagement processes.

The Carbon Plan will need to contain sector specific action and delivery plans, which would identify a programme of measures, the stakeholders required to deliver those measures, and identification of budgets or alternative routes to finance the measures.

The costs presented in the analysis are based on the values ascribed nationally by the CCC. These costs are net of any financial benefits (though do not consider further co-benefits e.g. improvements to air quality). These costs and benefits are also stated to not fall equally across society. For example, a domestic insulation programme that is funded for through energy bills (or subsidised by a local authority) would result in the cost being borne by society whilst the financial benefits would accrue only to those dwellings that receive insulation. For these reasons, it has not been possible here to obtain a gross cost of carbon reduction within each sector or for each measure. The analysis undertaken is “top down”, in that it allocates carbon reduction and costs from a national to a local level. This presumes a number of issues that may not be specifically true in the case of DPT, but the approach is nonetheless useful in providing an initial indication of the extent of the action required to achieve net-zero, given the source information available.

In order to estimate the gross cost of each measure then a “bottom up” measure-by-measure analysis would be needed. This would need to establish specific costs for all aspects of each measure. In the case of some measures these may not be available e.g. if the measure is not yet commercially developed and DPT is seeking to deploy earlier than nationally. Whilst measurement of costs on a gross basis would be more useful in terms of practically gathering budgets carbon reduction programmes, the presentation of the findings in net terms better demonstrates the strategic value within DPT of decarbonisation.

The next step should be to undertake further “bottom up” work to establish more specifically the amount of GHG emissions reduction that could be achieved. This analysis should include envisaged costs and savings and should be based on locally available resource assessments across each sector. It may be worthwhile separating this piece of work into an analysis of each sector.

These analyses should look to engage more widely with stakeholders in DPT to utilise the locally available expertise. DPT has made great progress in this having already established the Devon Climate Emergency Response Group and appointing a Net-Zero Task Force to develop a Devon Carbon Plan. The process will also involve a citizen’s assembly which will deliberate on the plan.

Budgets have been made available to support further evidence base analysis and wider public engagement processes.

The Carbon Plan will need to contain sector specific action and delivery plans, which would identify a programme of measures, the stakeholders required to deliver those measures, and identification of budgets or alternative routes to finance the measures.

The table below provides a summary of initial priority actions identified from this work as a starting point.

SectorImmediate Priority
GeneralUndertake a policy mapping exercise of current and proposed policy to establish where it supports or hinders carbon reduction and identify key gaps.
GeneralProduce sector-by-sector “bottom up” projections of GHG emissions using detailed local data.
PowerUndertake an up-to-date review of potential for renewable energy development and include RE development sites in the local plan.
PowerWork with WPD and others to ensure electricity infrastructure is capable of meeting increased local energy generation and demand for electricity from the heating, industry and transport sectors.
PowerPlanning policy should ensure all new buildings are connected to the electricity network via three-phase supplies.
PowerLook to trial and support smart electricity projects, including those with battery storage aspects.
BuildingsInvestigate opportunities to require zero carbon from all new planned development.
BuildingsUndertake a bottom-up assessment of opportunities for insulation in existing dwellings by tenure, and seek to make use of existing ECO funding whilst lobbying for more ambitious national insulation programmes.
BuildingsPro-actively enforce the MEES (Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards) which apply to all privately rented dwellings and non-domestic buildings.
BuildingsSeek to engage the non-domestic sector by working with landlords and institutions like the Chamber of Commerce to identify the potential for retrofitting existing non-domestic buildings.
BuildingsCreate a renewable heat strategy by appraising the potential for low carbon heat networks, heat pumps, and hybrid boilers, including identifying current potential funding models and barriers to uptake.
BuildingsWork in partnership with large energy users in the non-domestic sectors including health and education sectors to share best practice in energy reduction
IndustrySupport identified large emitters with carbon reduction activities.
IndustryUndertake a detailed review or business activity in DPT to identify energy-intensive industrial users.
IndustryAppraise the potential for low carbon industrial zones (LCIZ)
TransportExplore ways to promote the uptake of EVs e.g. via reduced or free parking, permissive use of bus lanes etc.
TransportWork with partners to plan and develop charging infrastructure across DPT in key public and work places and include plans to address the tourism sector
TransportSeek to shift trips from private car to lower carbon alternatives such as walking, cycling, car clubs and public transport.
TransportWork with bodies such as the Freight Transport Association and the Road Haulage Association as well as with major hauliers and haulage clients directly to reduce emissions from freight movement, for example by planning consolidation centres.
TransportWork with bus providers to consider the business case for replacing the existing bus fleet with zero carbon variants e.g. by following London’s example.
Agriculture land use & forestryUse County farms to pioneer changes in on farm practises to reduce methane and nitrous oxide intensity of crops and livestock farming and work with landowners and NFU to roll out countywide. Promote the adoption of low-impact diets.
Agriculture land use & forestrySupport the development of on-farm bio-methane collection and use with a focus on supplying bio-methane for farm machinery. Deliver on County farms together with electrification and building energy efficiency measures.
Agriculture land use & forestryUse the planning system to identify preferred areas for tree planting and peatland restoration which match the required scale, adopt planning policies which prioritise afforestation and peatland restoration and apply on county owned land.
WasteCheck status of all legacy and recent landfill sites and assess opportunities for additional methane capture and energy production.
WasteDrive forward increased separation of food/biodegradable waste collection with waste directed to local Anaerobic Digestion facilities.
WasteDevelop local promotion campaigns with the aim of reducing waste generation (especially food waste) with a 25% reduction by 2025 and to increase household recycling rates (especially plastics) from the current 56%  to 65%  to reduce disposal emissions from EfW.
WasteIncrease heat offtake from EfW plants to improve efficiency and reducing net emissions.
WasteIdentify processing gaps in wider South West region waste recycling and treatment facilities and make appropriate provision for particular materials where gaps are identified.
WasteDevelop a much better understanding of commercial waste generation and treatment in DPT to enable monitoring and regulation with the aim of reducing waste volumes and increasing recycling.
WasteLiaise with South West Water to achieve a reduction in methane and N2O emissions of least 20% by 2030.
F-gasesPro-actively enforce Air Conditioning inspections for all systems with an effective rated output in excess of 12 kW.
GHG RemovalIdentify potential sites where trial of GHG removal technologies may be viable and seek to capture central government funds in partnership with technology providers to host prototypes.

DPT’s GHG historic GHG emission trends are shown by GHG on Figures A1 and by sector in Figure A2. 

Figure A1: DPT’s emissions by GHG 
Figure A2: DPT’s GHG emissions by sector 

Total GHG emissions fell 19% between 2008 and 2016. However, much of the reduction is in the power sector which benefits from national renewable electricity production. If the power sector is excluded, GHG emissions fell 6% between 2008 and 2016 but emissions rose 5% between 2011 and 2016. The dominant sectors in 2016 (86% of emissions) were transport (28%), buildings (23%), agriculture and land use change (19%), and power (16%). 

This appendix contains the underlying data (tCO2e) in years 2016, 2032 and 2050 for the trajectory graphs (e.g. Figure 1) that are used for each sector within the report. 

Power 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 1,365,561 1,481,657 1,966,521 
Savings from lower-risk policies 0 277,389 0 
Savings from medium-risk policies 0 354,801 0 
Savings from high risk high-level intentions 0 253,687 0 
Savings from current policy gaps 0 170,682 0 
Savings to 2050 from Core Policies 0 0 1,813,558 
Savings to 2050 from Further Ambition Policies 0 0 121,040 
Adopt all measures pathway 1,365,561 425,098 31,923 

Buildings 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 1,934,984 2,123,524 2,347,825 
Savings from lower-risk policies 0 108,039 0 
Savings from medium-risk policies 0 107,787 0 
Savings from high risk high-level intentions 0 346,316 0 
Savings from current policy gaps 0 202,970 0 
Savings to 2050 from Core Policies 0 0 1,863,903 
Savings to 2050 from Further Ambition Policies 0 0 392,264 
Adopt all measures pathway 1,934,984 1,358,412 91,657 

Industry 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 42,674 37,365 34,393 
Savings from lower-risk policies 0 591 0 
Savings from medium-risk policies 0 1,214 0 
Savings from high risk high-level intentions 0 3,964 0 
Savings from current policy gaps 0 1,471 0 
Savings to 2050 from Core Policies 0 0 3,807 
Savings to 2050 from Further Ambition Policies 0 0 25,302 
Adopt all measures pathway 42,674 30,125 5,284 

Transport 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 2,321,850 2,444,626 2,767,396 
Savings from lower-risk policies 0 114,678 0 
Savings from medium-risk policies 0 505,282 0 
Savings from high risk high-level intentions 0 409,200 0 
Savings from current policy gaps 0 330,133 0 
Savings to 2050 from Core Policies 0 0 1,773,859 
Savings to 2050 from Further Ambition Policies 0 0 529,804 
Adopt all measures pathway 2,321,850 1,085,332 463,733 

Agriculture and Land Use Change 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 1,586,714 1,610,966 1,673,017 
Savings from lower-risk policies 0 0 0 
Savings from medium-risk policies 0 123,533 0 
Savings from high risk high-level intentions 0 22,024 0 
Savings from current policy gaps 0 116,705 0 
Savings to 2050 from Core Policies 0 0 398,618 
Savings to 2050 from Further Ambition Policies 0 0 188,321 
Adopt all measures pathway 1,586,714 1,348,704 1,086,079 

Waste 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 589,971 366,713 303,453 
Savings from lower-risk policies 0 0 0 
Savings from medium-risk policies 0 5,024 0 
Savings from high risk high-level intentions 0 27,217 0 
Savings from current policy gaps 0 58,797 0 
Savings to 2050 from Core Policies 0 0 107,084 
Savings to 2050 from Further Ambition Policies 0 0 27,931 
Adopt all measures pathway 589,971 275,675 168,438 

F-gases 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 452,488 469,732 563,118 
Savings from lower-risk policies 0 0 0 
Savings from medium-risk policies 0 398,719 0 
Savings from high risk high-level intentions 0 0 0 
Savings from current policy gaps 0 0 0 
Savings to 2050 from Core Policies 0 0 468,537 
Savings to 2050 from Further Ambition Policies 0 0 32,099 
Adopt all measures pathway 452,488 71,013 62,483 

DPT Total 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 8,294,242 8,534,584 9,655,723 
Savings from lower-risk policies 0 500,697 0 
Savings from medium-risk policies 0 1,496,362 0 
Savings from high risk high-level intentions 0 1,062,408 0 
Savings from current policy gaps 0 880,758 0 
Savings to 2050 from Core Policies 0 0 6,429,365 
Savings to 2050 from Further Ambition Policies 0 0 1,316,760 
Savings from GHG Removal: CCC low scenario 0 0 579,859 
Additional savings from GHG Removal: CCC high scenario 0 0 1,177,839 
Additional savings from GHG Removal: Royal Society scenario 0 0 597,980 
Adopt all measures pathway 8,294,242 4,594,359 -446,082 

DPT by Sector 

 2016 2032 2050 
BAU pathway 8,294,242 8,534,584 9,655,723 
Savings from Power Core Policies 0 1,056,559 1,813,558 
Savings from Power Further Ambition Policies 0 0 121,040 
Savings from Buildings Core Policies 0 765,112 1,863,903 
Savings from Buildings Further Ambition Policies 0 0 392,264 
Savings from Industry Core Policies 0 7,240 3,807 
Savings from Industry Further Ambition Policies 0 0 25,302 
Savings from Transport Core Policies 0 1,359,294 1,773,859 
Savings from Transport Further Ambition Policies 0 0 529,804 
Savings from Agriculture Core Policies 0 302,712 224,940 
Savings from Agriculture Further Ambition Policies 0 0 477,156 
Savings from LULUCF Core Policies 0 -40,450 173,678 
Savings from LULUCF Further Ambition Policies 0 0 -288,836 
Savings from Waste Core Policies 0 91,038 107,084 
Savings from Waste Further Ambition Policies 0 0 27,931 
Savings from F-gases Core Policies 0 398,719 468,537 
Savings from F-gases Further Ambition Policies 0 0 32,099 
Savings from GHG Removal: CCC low scenario 0 0 579,859 
Additional savings from GHG Removal: CCC high scenario 0 0 1,177,839 
Additional savings from GHG Removal: Royal Society scenario 0 0 597,980 
Adopt all measures pathway 8,294,242 4,594,359 -446,082 

1 See the CEE’s reports “Net Zero Devon” February 2020, “Carbon Neutral Plymouth” October 2019 and “Net Zero Torbay”, August 2020

2 For methodology see “Greenhouse Gas Inventories for SWEEG: Methodology Paper”,  CEE, July 2019

3 The CCC is a statutory body set up under the 2008 Climate Change Act whose purpose is to advise the UK Government and Devolved Administrations on emissions targets and report to Parliament on progress made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and preparing for climate change

4 The CCC’s 2019 Report to Parliament was released on 10 July 2019. The format of the 2019 report does not provide the sectorial analysis included in the 2018 report so the 2018 report has been used in this analysis.

5 The CCC’s “Net Zero, The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming” was published in May 2019 together with the Net Zero Technical report which is used extensively in these projections.

6 Carbon budget periods are periods of 5 years that commenced in 2008 when the UK Climate Change Act came into force.

7 “Greenhouse Gas Inventories for SWEEG: Methodology Paper”,  CEE, July 2019

8 An analysis of Devon’s historic aviation and shipping emissions concluded that due to the incomplete nature of the emissions data and high levels of uncertainty aviation and shipping should not be included. Estimates of aviation emissions for flights out of Exeter Airport suggested that aviation emissions from this source were some 9% of transport emissions and 3% of total emissions. Estimated emissions from fishing vessels were 1% of transport emissions and 0.3% of total emissions.

9 The projected BAU carbon emissions are based on nationally projected changes to emissions which include the impacts of population change (growth). Analysis of population projections show that by 2030 the UK population is set to increase at a slightly faster rate than the DPT’s population (the ratio of the two populations in 2030 indexed to 2019 is 98%) and so the nationally projected BAU carbon emissions were taken forward as being reasonable in the context of the uncertainties within the approach adopted for this study.

10 Figure 2.5 of the CCC 2018 progress report. Abbreviations: CCS carbon capture and storage, DSR demand side response, CfD contract for difference.

11 Figure 2.3 of the CCC Net Zero Technical report. Abbreviations: DACCS direct air carbon capture and storage, HGV heavy goods vehicle

12 Peaking plant 0.6TWh (not visible on Figure 7)

13 Figure 2.5 CCC Net Zero Technical report. Abbreviations; CCS carbon capture and storage, BECCS biomass energy with carbon capture and storage

14 Figure 2.8 CCC Net Zero Technical report

15 Exeter RP Limited  was awarded 4.5MW and 6.4MW capacity in the 2017/18 capacity auction and Peak Gen Exeter in an entry in the NAEI inventory

16 Source: “Renewable energy progress report for Devon 2018 to 2018” Regen, August 2019. Electricity and heat generation for AD, biomass and sewage gas disaggregated by splitting the shortfall between electricity only technologies (1,056 GWh) and total provided (1,085 GWh) using relative electrical capacity of each technology.

17 https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/sub-national-electriCounty-consumption-data

18 “A review of renewable energy resource assessment and targets for Devon” CEE 2011

19 In the high case constraints for wind resource included adequate wind speed, buffers around buildings. The lower case adds the constraints of practical access to sites, landowner willingness for development to go ahead, political will, the time to complete planning procedures and the distance to nearest electricity grid connection.

20 “Low Carbon and Climate Change Evidence Base for the Greater Exeter Strategic Plan” CEE, 2018

21 From ONS  Table P04UK 2011 Census: Population density, local authorities in the United Kingdom the areas of Devon and the GESP area are  656,422 ha and 244,818 ha respectively, a ratio of 2.6813.

22 “Land Requirements for Network-based Zero Carbon Energy Solutions in East Devon”, CEE, 2019

23 https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/sub-national-electricity-consumption-data

24 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/regional-renewable-statistics

25 Analysis of Carbon Targets for Plymouth City Council: 2014, University of Exeter, April 2014

26 119,300 homes projected in Plymouth in 2050.

27 “Torbay energy opportunities study”, University of Exeter, July 2016

28 Searches show Torbay Hospital to be the only large energy user in Torbay

29 A search of the Renewable Energy Foundation (REF) database to find generation data on RE generators (https://www.ref.org.uk/generators/) did not show any renewable energy schemes in Torbay.

30 Reference to “heat pumps” in buildings include individual air source and ground source heat pumps and  communal and hybrid heat pumps of both source types

31 CCC 2016, Next steps for UK Heat Policy

32 Figure 3.3 of the CCC 2018 Progress Report

33 Based on apportioning 2 million solid wall installations on fraction of solid wall properties in DPT compared to UK total

34 Based on analysis of uptake rates from WPD and Regen 2018, Distribution Future Energy Scenarios: A Generation and Demand Study – Technology Growth Scenarios to 2032. This establishes four pathways, of which the “Slow Progression” perhaps best aligns to the situation of the CCC Progress report. The implied installation rates in DPT in 2032 (taken as cumulative installations from 2019 to 2032) in new dwellings for the four pathways are: Steady State 1,641; Slow Progression 13,271; Consumer Power 4,365; Two degrees 19,906.

35 Based on analysis of uptake rates from WPD and Regen 2018, Distribution Future Energy Scenarios: A Generation and Demand Study – Technology Growth Scenarios to 2032. This establishes four pathways, of which the “Slow Progression” perhaps best aligns to the situation of the CCC Progress report. The implied installation rates in DPT in 2032 in existing dwellings for the four pathways are: Steady State 13,155; Slow Progression 31,438; Consumer Power 34,299; Two degrees 62,250.

36 Estimated based on number of local business units from Nomis national statistics (56,215 DPT total)

37 Note: As with the power sector, the gas grid can be considered to be national infrastructure and so where  bio-methane is produced is not relevant

38 Based on pro-rating the national installation rate to DPT based on direct emissions in 2016

39 If apportioned based on ratio of emissions from direct combustion of fuels in buildings in DPT compared to nationally.

40 In 2018 the RHI was updated to include the assignment of rights which allows a third party investor to help fund the purchase, installation and maintenance of renewable heating system in return for RHI payments.

41 Based on pro-rating the national installation rate to DPT based establishing % of national homes on a heat network in 2050 and applying this to projected homes in DPT in 2050.

42 Based on pro-rating the national installation rate to DPT based establishing % of national homes with heat pumps in 2050 and applying this to projected homes in DPT in 2050.

43 Based on pro-rating the national installation rate to DPT based on fraction of solid wall properties in DPT to national

44 Based on pro-rating the national installation rate to DPT based on fraction of cavity wall properties in DPT to national

45 Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee Oral evidence: Energy Efficiency, HC 1730, Tuesday 12 March 2019

46 Gov.uk Detailed report HEEE tables (accessed (19/8/19) https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/household-energy-efficiency-statistics-detailed-report-2018

47 https://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/home-insulation based on typical installation costs for a semi-detached property

48 https://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/renewable-energy/heat Average cost ASHP of £6,000  to £8,000 whilst GSHP are stated to cost £10,000 to £18,000

49 Categorised as “Large Industrial Installations” in BEIS statistics  see https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-local-authority-and-regional-carbon-dioxide-emissions-national-statistics-2005-2016

50 Figure 4.4 of the CCC 2018 Progress Report

51 Net Zero Technical Report Fig 4.5; stationary combustion 31.6 MtCO2e, other 2.5 MtCO2e, total 104.2MtCO2e

52 Figure 4.5 CCC Net Zero Technical report

53 Source data for 2018 https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/business/activitysizeandlocation/datasets/ukbusinessactivitysizeandlocation

54 Source data for 2018 https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/submit.asp?menuopt=201&subcomp=

55 See https://www.gov.uk/guidance/participating-in-the-eu-ets#free-allocation

56 See http://naei.beis.gov.uk/data/map-large-source

57 See https://data.gov.uk/dataset/4b709a17-6e98-4021-a207-137ac931bfc3/information-for-each-carbon-reduction-commitment-crc-participant

58 An analysis of Devon’s historic aviation and shipping emissions concluded that due to the incomplete nature of the emissions data and high levels of uncertainty aviation and shipping should not be included. Estimates of aviation emissions for flights out of Exeter Airport suggested that aviation emissions from this source were some 9% of transport emissions and 3% of total emissions. Estimated emissions from Devon’s fishing vessels were 1% of transport emissions and 0.3% of total emissions.

59 Figure 5.10 of the CCC 2018 Progress Report

60 Apportioned based on population.

61 WPD 2019, Western Power Distribution: Electric Vehicle Strategy

62 https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/environment/pollution-and-air-quality/cleaner-buses

63 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cars/news/hydrogen-fuel-cell-trains-run-british-railways-2022/

64 Figure 6.9 of the CCC 2018 Progress Report. Abbreviations: CAP Common Agricultural Policy

65 Based on the ratio of land area of Devon to England or UK respectively.

66 The UK Peatland Strategy 2018 – 2040, IUCN National Committee United Kingdom Peatland Programme.

67 https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/blue-carbon

68 Taken from Figure 7.4 of the CCC 2018 progress report

69 See https://environment.data.gov.uk/DefraDataDownload/?mapService=EA/HistoricLandfill&Mode=spatial

70 https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Assessment-of-potential-to-reduce-UK-F-gas-emissions-Ricardo-and-Gluckman-Consulting.pdf

71 Figure 8.3 of the CCC 2018 Progress Report. Abbreviations: MAC mobile air conditioning

72 Ricardo Energy and Environment 2019, ‘Assessment of the potential to reduce UK F-gas emissions beyond the ambition of the F-gas Regulation and Kigali Amendment’

73 Based on Forestry Commission statistics. Combining 2017 estimate of the sequestration of UK forestry (interpolated between 19.8 MtCO2 in 2015 and 21.1 MtCO2 in 2020) and total woodland area in 2017 (3,166,000ha) gives a sequestration rate of 6.4tCO2/ha/annum. Source https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/statistics/forestry-statistics/forestry-statistics-2017 .

74 The UK Peatland Strategy 2018 – 2040, IUCN National Committee United Kingdom Peatland Programme.

75 https://c8a.co.uk/about-us/ accessed 26/06/19

76 https://www.drax.com/press_release/world-first-co2-beccs-ccus/ accesses 26/06/19

77 https://ccmtechnologies.co.uk/technology accessed 26/06/19

78 http://www.nef.org.uk/knowledge-hub/energy-in-the-home/solid-wall-insulation

79 https://www.cibsejournal.com/case-studies/a-forward-leap-how-dutch-housing-process-energiesprong-guarantees-performance/

80 https://www.green-alliance.org.uk/resources/reinventing_retrofit.pdf [1] https://www.devon.gov.uk/energyandclimatechange/saving-energy/zero-energy-building-catalyst